4:37 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Bug ID: 2180613
Summary: Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support
for Cycles
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: blender
Severity: medium
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: koppe(a)posteo.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net,
design-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kwizart(a)gmail.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net,
negativo17(a)gmail.com, promac(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
With Intel Level Zero now available in the Fedora repositories, I think the
version of Blender shipped with Fedora should be compiled with Cycles oneAPI
support for Intel GPUs enabled, currently only CUDA and HIP are enabled
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
8:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> ---
Currently, SYCL 6.0+ is missing in the repository:
[...]
-- Could NOT find SYCL (missing: SYCL_LIBRARY SYCL_INCLUDE_DIR)
-- Found LevelZero: /usr/lib64/libze_loader.so
-- oneAPI not found, disabling WITH_CYCLES_DEVICE_ONEAPI
-- SYCL 6.0+ or Level Zero not found, disabling WITH_CYCLES_DEVICE_ONEAPI
[...]
One of Intel contributor is working on bring such support at this time of
writing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
9:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Koppe <koppe(a)posteo.de> ---
Is SYCL really a runtime dependency for Blender with oneAPI support? Because I
can run Blender's own builds from their website (compiled with oneAPI support)
just fine with only intel-compute-runtime and oneapi-level-zero installed from
Fedora's repos.
It seems like SYCL is only required for compilation. But I guess Fedora's
packaging guidelines require all build dependencies to also be available in the
repository?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
3:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> ---
According to version.cmake
(https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/src/branch/main/build_files/...)
file from Blender source, minimal version 20220919 of dpcpp (Intel SYCL
currently as nightly release) is needed for compilation.
https://github.com/intel/llvm/archive/refs/tags/sycl-nightly/
Logically, upstream Blender build uses compiler which is currently unavailable
in Fedora repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
2:48 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Koppe <koppe(a)posteo.de> ---
Has any progress been made bringing sycl/dpcpp to Fedora yet or is there any
way such progress can be followed somewhere?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
6:31 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Koppe <koppe(a)posteo.de> ---
I hope this doesn't come across as overly naggy, but is there any update on the
state of this? Apparently there was already some work in progress to bring sycl
to Fedora, but I suppose those plans haven't really materialized?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
11:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |SubFeature
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> ---
Not yet so far.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
3:02 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
It would be a first step to see if one can make a dedicated build using this
content:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/tools/oneapi/base-toolk...
For some reason, I was not able to install the toolkit on fedora-38...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
4:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
Also maybe it worth to coordinate with frantisekz as he already has some
components packaged as part of the intel-media-driver-free effort.
(https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/frantisekz/intel-media-driver-fre...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:53 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com,
| |fzatlouk(a)redhat.com
Flags| |needinfo?(aekoroglu(a)linux.i
| |ntel.com)
| |needinfo?(fzatlouk(a)redhat.c
| |om)
--- Comment #9 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> ---
Lets add aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com who is also interested to maintain the
oneAPI stack and @frantisekzfrantisekz to possibly package oneAPI-dpcpp.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
5:23 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Ali Erdinc Koroglu <aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(aekoroglu(a)linux.i |
|ntel.com) |
--- Comment #10 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu <aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com> ---
Hello, I've started to work on oneAPI-dpcpp so this issue and the rest of the
oneAPI-rendering-toolkit is in my OKRs to complete in Q3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Feature Request: compile |Feature Request: oneAPI
|blender with oneAPI support |support for Cycles coming
|for Cycles |on Q3 2023
Keywords| |FutureFeature, Task
Flags|needinfo?(fzatlouk(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #11 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> ---
Thanks Ali. Changing the title to reflect the progress.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:17 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(aekoroglu(a)linux.i
| |ntel.com)
--- Comment #12 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net> ---
(In reply to Ali Erdinc Koroglu from comment #10)
Hello, I've started to work on oneAPI-dpcpp so this issue and the
rest of
the oneAPI-rendering-toolkit is in my OKRs to complete in Q3.
Any update for packaging oneAPI-dpcpp?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
1:58 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #13 from František Zatloukal <fzatlouk(a)redhat.com> ---
I've briefly looked into it, and as of now, if I am not missing anything, it's
impossible to package this to Fedora. I wasn't able to find any sources for the
dpcpp and its dependencies from the suite. eg. Archlinux packages just unpack
the .deb files. It also comes with a bundled llvm (17, it seems) that may have
some non-upstream patches.
The first step would be to have a source of this, then it may be possible to
package it into Fedora (depending on the license, the arch package currently
states "custom" which is a problem). Ali, do you have any idea/inside ways what
to do with it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
11:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Ali Erdinc Koroglu <aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(aekoroglu(a)linux.i |
|ntel.com) |
--- Comment #14 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu <aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com> ---
Hello everyone,
We already started to discuss about this DPC++ issue with Red Hat and,
I will be preparing the compiler package for Fedora from
https://github.com/intel/llvm "SYCL branch", which is a derivative of DPC++.
The compiler requires a minimum TBB version of 2021 but Fedora has shipped with
version 2020.3
On the other hand, Fedora 40 will include TBB 2021.8
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F40ModernizeTBB)
So, we should wait until TBB 2021.8 is successfully implemented in F40.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
2:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #15 from Alexander Koppe <koppe(a)posteo.de> ---
Thanks everyone for the updates and your work on this. That is great news with
F40 around the corner. Seems like things slowly start to fall into place with
all of Intel's oneapi stuff on Fedora. Hope this will be ready and in a usable
state for F41 maybe.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:20 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Koppe <koppe(a)posteo.de> ---
Hello,
with Fedora 40 now officially released and TBB 2021.11 available in the repos,
is there any progress update on your efforts to bring the necessary compiler
package to Fedora?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
11:01 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
--- Comment #17 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 38 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 38 on
2024-05-21.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '38'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version'
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 38 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
9:33 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed| |2024-05-21 14:33:04
--- Comment #18 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
Fedora Linux 38 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2024-05-21.
Fedora Linux 38 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora
Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.
If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
10:33 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2180613] Feature Request: oneAPI support for Cycles coming on Q3 2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
František Zatloukal <fzatlouk(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|EOL |---
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|38 |rawhide
Keywords| |Reopened
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613
12
days inactive
439
days old
epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
19 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com