FBR: To update ostree on bodhi-backend01, branched-composer, rawhide-composer

[Mohan Boddu]

Hi,

Randomly we hit an issue in "ostree pull-local" command that it wont
sync and throws out a traceback. The new ostree build adds more
logging and should help us with concurrently pulling.

Both rawhide-composer.phx2.fp.o and branched-composer.phx2.fp.o are on
F31 and there is a build for it and submitted as an update
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f265f98566

For bodhi-backend01.phx2.fp.o is still on F30, for which there isn't a
build for f30. So, I backported the patches to F30 and built an infra
build for F30 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43574522.
Its not tagged because I dont have infra permissions, but I tagged it
manually and it is signed now and tagged into f30-infra-stg. I will
move it to f30-infra once this FBR is approved and will update the
box.

If you think we need to be careful, then I can apply the patch to
rawhide-composer.phx2.fp.o and based on how that goes, we can update
the others.

Thanks.

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 04:23:39PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>  Hi,
>  
>  Randomly we hit an issue in "ostree pull-local" command that it wont
>  sync and throws out a traceback. The new ostree build adds more
>  logging and should help us with concurrently pulling.
>  
>  Both rawhide-composer.phx2.fp.o and branched-composer.phx2.fp.o are on
>  F31 and there is a build for it and submitted as an update
>  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f265f98566
>  
>  For bodhi-backend01.phx2.fp.o is still on F30, for which there isn't a
>  build for f30. So, I backported the patches to F30 and built an infra
>  build for F30 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43574522.
>  Its not tagged because I dont have infra permissions, but I tagged it
>  manually and it is signed now and tagged into f30-infra-stg. I will
>  move it to f30-infra once this FBR is approved and will update the
>  box.
>  
>  If you think we need to be careful, then I can apply the patch to
>  rawhide-composer.phx2.fp.o and based on how that goes, we can update
>  the others. 
+1 

kevin

[Stephen John Smoogen]

+1

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 17:05, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 04:23:39PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > Randomly we hit an issue in "ostree pull-local" command that it wont
>  > sync and throws out a traceback. The new ostree build adds more
>  > logging and should help us with concurrently pulling.
>  >
>  > Both rawhide-composer.phx2.fp.o and branched-composer.phx2.fp.o are on
>  > F31 and there is a build for it and submitted as an update
>  > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f265f98566
>  >
>  > For bodhi-backend01.phx2.fp.o is still on F30, for which there isn't a
>  > build for f30. So, I backported the patches to F30 and built an infra
>  > build for F30
>  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43574522.
>  > Its not tagged because I dont have infra permissions, but I tagged it
>  > manually and it is signed now and tagged into f30-infra-stg. I will
>  > move it to f30-infra once this FBR is approved and will update the
>  > box.
>  >
>  > If you think we need to be careful, then I can apply the patch to
>  > rawhide-composer.phx2.fp.o and based on how that goes, we can update
>  > the others.
>
>  +1
>
>  kevin
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to
>  infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>  

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.