On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:10:40PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Paul W. Frields
<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:53:46AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Nalley <david(a)gnsa.us> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
<smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not
>> >> causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need
>> >> to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on
>> >> staging again.
>> >>
>> >
>> > What do you need RPMs of?
>>
>> Make sure that
>> zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-2.el5.fedora.infra.noarch.rpm is
>> the latest one of those,
>
> Would this be 0.4 instead, which is the branch I just created based on
> the fixes that mateo collected?
Quite probably. I have been treating the packages as black boxes for
better or for worse.
I could be wrong -- but I think that packages dealing with FAS
authentication aren't usually published in the general repositories.
David Nalley provides SRPMs at:
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/
The specfile in the SRPM will probably require a few changes for a
0.4-1 release, since mateo rearranged the tree in the git repository
in a more logical fashion. Do we know who's going to do that?
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com