firefox 1.0.1 and java
by Gerhard Magnus
Once I installed the new firefox 1.0.1 I lost the java runtime
environment I had finally been able to get working with firefox 1.0.
The "About Mozilla Firefox" window says I'm running "Firefox/1.0.1
Fedora/1.0.1-1.3.2". I assume this new version of firefox is using
files from the directory tree that starts /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1, which
means I need to make a symbolic link (using the ln -s command)
from /usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
to /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1/plugins. This is the same procedure I
successfully used before to make the link in
the /usr/lib/firefox-1.0/plugins directory.
For some reason this procedure is not working -- the new link
in /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1/plugins appears in red instead of blue. I've
tried deleting the link (using rm -r) from both
the /usr/lib/firefox-1.0/plugins and the /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1/plugins
directories. Although they no longer show up (using ls -al) the link
creation (using ln -s) still gives a non-functioning link. Then when I
do a locate libjavaplugin_oji.so I get --
/usr/java/j2re1.4.2_06/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so
/usr/java/j2re1.4.2_06/plugin/i386/ns610-gcc32/libjavaplugin_oji.so
/usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
/usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7-gcc29/libjavaplugin_oji.so
/usr/lib/firefox-1.0/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so
/usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so
which seems to be saying the links are still there in both firefox
directories! When I try ls -l on the /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1/plugins
directory I get:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Mar 6 16:51 libjavaplugin_oji.so ->
libjavaplugin_oji.so
flashing in red -- it looks like the link is linking to itself. Or
something.... Any suggestions on how to clean this up or at least to
hack through it further?
18 years, 7 months
Re: OT - Please Help with sane / scanner
by Michael Wiktowy
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:01:25 -0700
From: kevin.kempter(a)dataintellect.com
>Hi List ;
>
>I bought a Plustek OpticSlim M12 sheetfeed usb scanner.
>If I run sane-find-scanner I see the following:
>found USB scanner (vendor=0x07b3, product=0x0412 [600dpi USB Scanner],
>chip=GT-6816?) at libusb:002:004
> # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be supported
>by
> # SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.
>
>However if I run scanimage -L I get this:
>No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
>check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
>sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
>which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).
>
>I dont know where to go from here...
>
>Thanks in advance for any help
>
If you check out the SANE Projects Supported Devices list here:
http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-PLUSTEK
It looks like your scanner is not supported ... yet.
Since there is some similarity with other scanners from Plustek, it
looks like it may be supported in the near future but there is no way of
telling how near that future will be.
You could try uncommenting the backend in dll.conf that is indicated to
be similar (sane-gt68xx
<http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-gt68xx.5.html>) but it is known to
not *specifically* encompass your chipset ... but you could get lucky
and get partial functionality.
If all else fails, file a bug report with the SANE project requesting
your chipset to be supported and provide them some details of your
hardware if asked.
http://www.sane-project.org/bugs.html
/Mike
18 years, 7 months
unable to install mozilla suite
by Guillermo Garron
Hi,
I have downloaded the mozilla suite.
i have FC4 and when i ran the installer script. i got an error saying
the xpistub library i went to rpm.pbone.net but could not find this
library's RPM coudl any body help me please?
greetings
Guillermo Garron
18 years, 7 months
RE: Apache: httpd; apachectl status and fullstatus.
by Dan Thurman
I tried that. Did not work. I am wondering if I missed
a system configuration step, namely that typing
domainname results in an empty system domain name
setting? I tried domainname cdkkt.com and that did
not work either.
So, I am at loss as to why this is a problem....
PS: Let me know if domainname is used - I just
dont recall if this is needed. The /etc/resolv.conf
does have a 'search cdkkt.com' entry in it.
Thanks -
Dan
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:51 AM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>Subject: Re: Apache: httpd; apachectl status and fullstatus.
>
>
>Am Di, den 01.11.2005 schrieb Daniel B. Thurman um 18:15:
>
>> I am trying to install FrontPage extensions on FC4 and I think
>> I stumbled on why I was not able to even get started. My guess
>> is that the FP script is expecting to locate the apache http version
>> which it is not able to locate? But in any case, I was not able to
>> get the apachectl status or apachectl fullstatus to work:
>
>> ==============================================
>> Uncommenting in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, the following
>> and changing the Allow from directive:
>> ==============================================
>> # Note: mod_status.so is loaded
>>
>> <Location /server-status>
>> SetHandler server-status
>> Order deny,allow
>> Deny from all
>> Allow from cdkkt.com
>
>Allow too from localhost.
>
>> </Location>
>> ==============================================
>> And executing:
>> > apache status (and apache fullstatus has the same output)
>> ==============================================
>> Forbidden
>>
>> You don't have permission to access /server-status on this server.
>
>> Dan
>
>Alexander
>
>
>--
>Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
>legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
>Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp
>Serendipity 19:49:50 up 3 days, 17:50, load average: 0.08, 0.15, 0.10
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release
>Date: 10/31/2005
>
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release Date: 10/31/2005
18 years, 7 months
RE: Apache: httpd; apachectl status and fullstatus. [FrontPage install fails]
by Dan Thurman
Final note: IGNORE STEP (3) in the instructions. Uncommenting
the <VirtualHost *> ... </VirtualHost> block causes the administrative
step (port 8090) to fail.
Dan
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Daniel B. Thurman
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:39 AM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>Subject: RE: Apache: httpd;apachectl status and fullstatus. [FrontPage
>install fails]
>
>
>
>OK, I changed the <Location /server-status> section and
>allowed everyone to access it and note that the apachectl
>command does work. I tried to install FrontPage and it still
>fails. Rats. As far as why I cannot get server-status to work
>"out of the box" is not my current issue I will leave it to those
>who care.
>
>For those who want details of the failed FP installation:
>
>=====================================================
>Where is the current apache control file (apachectl) located:
>[]/usr/sbin/apachectl
>Currently running Apache/
>Checking for previous versions of FrontPage Server Extensions
>to upgrade...
>You have no previous versions of FrontPage Server Extensions installed.
>There are no settings to migrate!
>
>For Apache 2.0, FrontPage requires Apache version or later.
>Please first upgrade to Apache 2.0.40 or later, with mod_so.
>======================================================
>
>OK - I figured it out.
>
>To install FP on FC4:
>
>1) Follow instructions in:
>http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_apache2_frontpage2002
> but do not install the fp product until these steps
> are first performed:
>
> a) Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
> 1) Look for the Listen *:80, change it to 80
> 2) Comment out default Virtual Host: <VirtualHost *> ...
></VirtualHost>
> b) Rename or delete: /var/www/html/auth/.htaccess file if exist.
> c) Get previous version's apachectl shell-script file. I
>used FC2's script.
> Current script apparently is either broken or changed so that
> behavior is different. apachectl -v start for example does
> not return any version information, for example and the fp script
> requires it.
>2) Complete the rest of the installation instructions from (1) above.
>3) You might want to uncomment the <VirtualHost *> ... </VirtualHost>
> block, but I am testing to see of that will cause any problems. It
> shouldn't but I don't know. If it does, comment it back out.
>
>I think that covers it...
>
>Dan
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
>>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Daniel B. Thurman
>>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:16 AM
>>To: For users of Fedora Core releases (E-mail)
>>Subject: Apache: httpd; apachectl status and fullstatus.
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Folks,
>>
>>I am trying to install FrontPage extensions on FC4 and I think
>>I stumbled on why I was not able to even get started. My guess
>>is that the FP script is expecting to locate the apache http version
>>which it is not able to locate? But in any case, I was not able to
>>get the apachectl status or apachectl fullstatus to work:
>>
>>==============================================
>>> apache status (and apache fullstatus has the same output)
>>==============================================
>> Not Found
>>
>> The requested URL /server-status was not found on this server.
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>-----------
>>
>> Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) Server at [1]xxxxx.cdkkt.com Port 80
>>
>>References
>>
>> Visible links
>> 1. mailto:xxxx@xxxxx.xxxxx (purposely consealed)
>>==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>Uncommenting in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, the following
>>and changing the Allow from directive:
>>==============================================
>># Note: mod_status.so is loaded
>>
>><Location /server-status>
>> SetHandler server-status
>> Order deny,allow
>> Deny from all
>> Allow from cdkkt.com
>></Location>
>>==============================================
>>And executing:
>>> apache status (and apache fullstatus has the same output)
>>==============================================
>> Forbidden
>>
>> You don't have permission to access /server-status on this server.
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>-----------
>>
>> Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) Server at [1]xxxxx.cdkkt.com Port 80
>>
>>References
>>
>> Visible links
>> 1. mailto:xxxx@xxxxx.xxxxx (purposely consealed)
>>==============================================
>>
>>I tried everything I could for the 'Allow from', i.e. 10.1.0,
>>10.1.0.0/255.0.0.0
>>and so on to no avail. Any clues?
>>
>>Thanks!
>>Dan
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release
>>Date: 10/31/2005
>>
>>
>>--
>>fedora-list mailing list
>>fedora-list(a)redhat.com
>>To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release
>>Date: 10/31/2005
>>
>>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release
>Date: 10/31/2005
>
>
>--
>fedora-list mailing list
>fedora-list(a)redhat.com
>To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release
>Date: 10/31/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release Date: 10/31/2005
18 years, 7 months
RE: Apache: httpd; apachectl status and fullstatus. [FrontPage install fails]
by Dan Thurman
OK, I changed the <Location /server-status> section and
allowed everyone to access it and note that the apachectl
command does work. I tried to install FrontPage and it still
fails. Rats. As far as why I cannot get server-status to work
"out of the box" is not my current issue I will leave it to those
who care.
For those who want details of the failed FP installation:
=====================================================
Where is the current apache control file (apachectl) located: []/usr/sbin/apachectl
Currently running Apache/
Checking for previous versions of FrontPage Server Extensions to upgrade...
You have no previous versions of FrontPage Server Extensions installed.
There are no settings to migrate!
For Apache 2.0, FrontPage requires Apache version or later.
Please first upgrade to Apache 2.0.40 or later, with mod_so.
======================================================
OK - I figured it out.
To install FP on FC4:
1) Follow instructions in: http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_apache2_frontpage2002
but do not install the fp product until these steps
are first performed:
a) Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
1) Look for the Listen *:80, change it to 80
2) Comment out default Virtual Host: <VirtualHost *> ... </VirtualHost>
b) Rename or delete: /var/www/html/auth/.htaccess file if exist.
c) Get previous version's apachectl shell-script file. I used FC2's script.
Current script apparently is either broken or changed so that
behavior is different. apachectl -v start for example does
not return any version information, for example and the fp script
requires it.
2) Complete the rest of the installation instructions from (1) above.
3) You might want to uncomment the <VirtualHost *> ... </VirtualHost>
block, but I am testing to see of that will cause any problems. It
shouldn't but I don't know. If it does, comment it back out.
I think that covers it...
Dan
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Daniel B. Thurman
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:16 AM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases (E-mail)
>Subject: Apache: httpd; apachectl status and fullstatus.
>
>
>
>Hi Folks,
>
>I am trying to install FrontPage extensions on FC4 and I think
>I stumbled on why I was not able to even get started. My guess
>is that the FP script is expecting to locate the apache http version
>which it is not able to locate? But in any case, I was not able to
>get the apachectl status or apachectl fullstatus to work:
>
>==============================================
>> apache status (and apache fullstatus has the same output)
>==============================================
> Not Found
>
> The requested URL /server-status was not found on this server.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------
>
> Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) Server at [1]xxxxx.cdkkt.com Port 80
>
>References
>
> Visible links
> 1. mailto:xxxx@xxxxx.xxxxx (purposely consealed)
>==============================================
>
>
>
>==============================================
>Uncommenting in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, the following
>and changing the Allow from directive:
>==============================================
># Note: mod_status.so is loaded
>
><Location /server-status>
> SetHandler server-status
> Order deny,allow
> Deny from all
> Allow from cdkkt.com
></Location>
>==============================================
>And executing:
>> apache status (and apache fullstatus has the same output)
>==============================================
> Forbidden
>
> You don't have permission to access /server-status on this server.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------
>
> Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) Server at [1]xxxxx.cdkkt.com Port 80
>
>References
>
> Visible links
> 1. mailto:xxxx@xxxxx.xxxxx (purposely consealed)
>==============================================
>
>I tried everything I could for the 'Allow from', i.e. 10.1.0,
>10.1.0.0/255.0.0.0
>and so on to no avail. Any clues?
>
>Thanks!
>Dan
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release
>Date: 10/31/2005
>
>
>--
>fedora-list mailing list
>fedora-list(a)redhat.com
>To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release
>Date: 10/31/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release Date: 10/31/2005
18 years, 7 months
Load balancer
by Tom Ok
Hey all
I'm using FC4 as a load blanacer with ipvsadm.
where can i find information on patches applied to fc4 kernel's?
there is a specific patch i need to solve a specific problem with my
setup see... http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html#LVS-N...
It's not something related to fc but i tried at the lvs-list with no
success. so i'm trying to find out if the patch is already applied in
fc4 stock kernel or should i apply it manually.
Thanks.
Tomer
18 years, 7 months
Apache: httpd; apachectl status and fullstatus.
by Dan Thurman
Hi Folks,
I am trying to install FrontPage extensions on FC4 and I think
I stumbled on why I was not able to even get started. My guess
is that the FP script is expecting to locate the apache http version
which it is not able to locate? But in any case, I was not able to
get the apachectl status or apachectl fullstatus to work:
==============================================
> apache status (and apache fullstatus has the same output)
==============================================
Not Found
The requested URL /server-status was not found on this server.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) Server at [1]xxxxx.cdkkt.com Port 80
References
Visible links
1. mailto:xxxx@xxxxx.xxxxx (purposely consealed)
==============================================
==============================================
Uncommenting in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, the following
and changing the Allow from directive:
==============================================
# Note: mod_status.so is loaded
<Location /server-status>
SetHandler server-status
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from cdkkt.com
</Location>
==============================================
And executing:
> apache status (and apache fullstatus has the same output)
==============================================
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /server-status on this server.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) Server at [1]xxxxx.cdkkt.com Port 80
References
Visible links
1. mailto:xxxx@xxxxx.xxxxx (purposely consealed)
==============================================
I tried everything I could for the 'Allow from', i.e. 10.1.0, 10.1.0.0/255.0.0.0
and so on to no avail. Any clues?
Thanks!
Dan
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/152 - Release Date: 10/31/2005
18 years, 7 months
gcc not compiling
by Dotan Cohen
I'm just getting started in programming C. My first attempt:
#include < stdio.h>
void main () {
printf("\nHello World!\n");
}
Threw this error:
[dotancohen@localhost ~]$ gcc hello.c
hello.c:1:20: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
hello.c: In function 'main':
hello.c:3: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function 'printf'
hello.c:2: warning: return type of 'main' is not 'int'
hello.c:4:2: warning: no newline at end of file
So I googled for "1:20: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory"
and found a post that suggests that the answer to the problem is found
in the gcc manual. So I started reading it, but it is long and I'm not
finding anything!
I think that I'm missing a library stdio.h but I don't know where to
find it, and where to put it once I do find it. Or am I completly
wrong? The error message is pretty clear.
Dotan Cohen
http://technology-sleuth.com/question/how_can_i_be_safe_online.html
18 years, 7 months
Viewing JSPs from Mozilla Browser on Fedora
by Frank Bogle
Hello All,
I am developing a J2EE application on a hosted Linux Data Centre,
I have a local instance of Fedora 1 installed at home and was wondering if
anyone knows about limitations of Mozilla for viewing JSPs.
The basic problem is that I have defined some entity and session java beans
in JBoss and am using these to populate some JSPs for query based details.
Some of the JSPs work well in Mozilla others do not.
It is an odd problem because from a WinXP client the server application
works perfectly.
Has anyone had problems like this and if so what do I need to do to get my
Mozilla browser to work correctly?
The main area of my confusion is why do some JSPs work and others fail to
load on Mozilla when they all work from WinXP.
The JSP engine is Jakarta Struts.
Any ideas, insights or views really appreciated.
In addition to this does anyone know if a proven method to upgrade Fedora 1
to the latest version of Fedora? I guess that I will use yum but where do I
point it to..?
Regards All
Franko
18 years, 7 months
