Re: evince
by Patrick Dupre
> >
> > In looking at the document's properties and selecting the "fonts" tab I noticed that it was using /usr/share/fonts/google-croscore/SymbolNeu.ttf for symbols on my F19 system. This comes with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts package. Erasing this package resulted in a "delta" being displayed as /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/s050000l.pfb is now being used.
In my case, I use for symbol:
/usr/sahre/fonts/wine-symbol-fonts/symbol.ttf
In my opinion, this is the faultry font.
I dug a bit,
In the symbol font, the Delta character is U+0394, while the increment character
is U+2206 (looks very simiar to a Delta), and it is just beside the empty set
character U+2205, the one which is probably displayed (like a Phi).
So, there is a mess up here.
> >
> >
>
> FWIW, the same issue exists in the current F20 Beta. I'll be filling a bugzilla on this.....
>
> --
> Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
> --
> users mailing list
> users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 6 months
evince
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
is \Phi.
Would you know what is wrong?
Thank.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 6 months
Re: nx
by Patrick Dupre
Hello Mike,
Thank for the clarifications. However, in my opinion there is still
something missing.
nb-libs is suppsed to provide nx, however, this is the list of
provided files:
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/nx-libs-i386.conf
/usr/lib/nx
/usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21
/usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21/LICENSE
/usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.21/README
/usr/share/nx/SecurityPolicy
I cannot see in this list a nx, nxssh or a nxclient executable file, ie. /usr/bin/nx!
Maybe nxagent would do it, but I am not sure.
Regards.
>
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:42:38 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Thank for your feedback.
> >
> > I do not know what else do you need, anyway I attach a full file
>
> Thanks!
>
> The output is based on --skip-broken, so it's harder to read, but:
>
> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/nxssh for package: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package nx.i686 0:3.5.0-17.fc19 will be obsoleted
> ---> Package nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 will be obsoleting
>
> The new "nx-libs" package replaces "nx", which includes /usr/bin/nxssh as
> needed by "qtnx".
>
> "qtnx" is a subpackage built from the "freenx-client" src.rpm package:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6080
>
> It still exists in F19, but it has been orphaned in F20:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/freenx-client
>
> > It was Bug 1036426
>
> Wrong component "yum". This is a bug in "nx", respectively the new "nx-libs".
> I've pointed at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1034046
> before.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 6 months
Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on
by Hugh Caley
I'm voting for Cinnamon, since the developer of compiz isn't interested
in keeping it going. But maybe if MATE was the default for Fedora he'd
change his mind? Or someone else would take over?
Hugh
--
*Hugh Caley
Software Developer, Rocket Aldon
Rocket Software*
6001 Shellmound St. Ste. 600 · Emeryville, CA 94608 · USA ·
Tel:+1.510.285.8542
Email:hcaley@rocketsoftware.com Web:http://aldon.rocketsoftware.com
10 years, 6 months
Re: nx
by Patrick Dupre
Thank for your feedback.
I do not know what else do you need, anyway I attach a full file
In addition, yum wants to update:
nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc19
nxagent-3.5.0.21-3.fc19
nxproxy-3.5.0.21-3.fc19
and it failed to process request:
qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 requires /usr/bin/nxssh : Success - empty transaction
It was Bug 1036426
Thank again.
> Subject: Re: nx
>
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:14:43 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I do not understand why I get a dependencies issue with nx:
> > Skipped (dependency problems):
> > libNX_X11.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xcomposite.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > libNX_Xdamage.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xdmcp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > libNX_Xext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xfixes.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > libNX_Xinerama.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xpm.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > libNX_Xrandr.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xrender.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > libNX_Xtst.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcomp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > libXcompext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcompshad.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxagent.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > nxproxy.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> >
> >
> > This is what is installed:
> > nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686
> > qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> > freenx-server-0.7.3-31.fc19.i686
> > freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> > nxclient-3.5.0-7.i386
> > nxcl-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> >
> >
> > What is wrong?
> >
> > On a fedora 18, I have:
> > freenx-server-0.7.3-30.fc18.x86_64
> > nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64
> > nx-3.5.0-12.fc18.x86_64
> > nxcl-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
> > freenx-client-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
> > nxnode-3.5.0-9.x86_64
> > nxserver-3.5.0-11.x86_64
> > qtnx-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
> >
> > And every thing is OK!
>
> I've replied to your mail "yum update" yesterday. Why did you create
> a new thread? And once again you've truncated Yum output too much.
>
> > I submitted the issue at bugzilla, but it not been considered as a bug!!!!
>
> Which ticket number?
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 6 months
nx
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
I do not understand why I get a dependencies issue with nx:
Skipped (dependency problems):
libNX_X11.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xcomposite.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
libNX_Xdamage.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xdmcp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
libNX_Xext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xfixes.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
libNX_Xinerama.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xpm.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
libNX_Xrandr.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xrender.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
libNX_Xtst.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcomp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
libXcompext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcompshad.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxagent.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
nxproxy.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
This is what is installed:
nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686
qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686
freenx-server-0.7.3-31.fc19.i686
freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686
nxclient-3.5.0-7.i386
nxcl-0.9-16.fc19.i686
What is wrong?
On a fedora 18, I have:
freenx-server-0.7.3-30.fc18.x86_64
nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64
nx-3.5.0-12.fc18.x86_64
nxcl-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
freenx-client-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
nxnode-3.5.0-9.x86_64
nxserver-3.5.0-11.x86_64
qtnx-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
And every thing is OK!
I submitted the issue at bugzilla, but it not been considered as a bug!!!!
Thank for your help
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 6 months
Writing to an USB stick on Fedora 19
by Florian Weimer
What's the correct way to write an image to a USB stick? I don't write
to it while any file systems are mounted. Mounting happens
automatically when I plug in the stick, and if I click "Eject" in the
GNOME notification, the /dev/sdb block device assigned to the stick is
still present, but dead—the open system call fails with ENOMEDIUM.
I've got a fairly default Fedora 19 installation, running GNOME in
Classic Mode, still running the 3.11.6-201.fc19.x86_64 kernel.
(Right now, I overwrite the start of the stick with zeros while the
system is mounted, sync, unplug, and the plug it in again, for the
actual write operation, but that can't be the right thing to do.)
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
10 years, 6 months
Re: nx
by Patrick Dupre
Did I make some progesses?
I removed nx, freenx-client and qtnx, to be able to install nxagent, nx-libs, nxproxy
but then I lost nx.
I cannot reinstall nx:
Package nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686 is obsoleted by nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc19.i686 which is already installed
Nothing to do
But nx-libs does not provide a nx executable
I cannot install freenx-client either:
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686 from fedora
qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 from fedora
In my opinion, it is a real bug!!
> Subject: Re: nx
>
> Thank for your feedback.
>
> I do not know what else do you need, anyway I attach a full file
>
> In addition, yum wants to update:
> nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> nxagent-3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> nxproxy-3.5.0.21-3.fc19
>
> and it failed to process request:
> qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 requires /usr/bin/nxssh : Success - empty transaction
>
> It was Bug 1036426
>
> Thank again.
>
> > Subject: Re: nx
> >
> > On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:14:43 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I do not understand why I get a dependencies issue with nx:
> > > Skipped (dependency problems):
> > > libNX_X11.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xcomposite.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > libNX_Xdamage.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xdmcp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > libNX_Xext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xfixes.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > libNX_Xinerama.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xpm.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > libNX_Xrandr.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libNX_Xrender.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > libNX_Xtst.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcomp.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > libXcompext.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 libXcompshad.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > nx-libs.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19 nxagent.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > > nxproxy.i686 0:3.5.0.21-3.fc19
> > >
> > >
> > > This is what is installed:
> > > nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i686
> > > qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> > > freenx-server-0.7.3-31.fc19.i686
> > > freenx-client-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> > > nxclient-3.5.0-7.i386
> > > nxcl-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> > >
> > >
> > > What is wrong?
> > >
> > > On a fedora 18, I have:
> > > freenx-server-0.7.3-30.fc18.x86_64
> > > nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64
> > > nx-3.5.0-12.fc18.x86_64
> > > nxcl-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
> > > freenx-client-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
> > > nxnode-3.5.0-9.x86_64
> > > nxserver-3.5.0-11.x86_64
> > > qtnx-0.9-15.fc18.x86_64
> > >
> > > And every thing is OK!
> >
> > I've replied to your mail "yum update" yesterday. Why did you create
> > a new thread? And once again you've truncated Yum output too much.
> >
> > > I submitted the issue at bugzilla, but it not been considered as a bug!!!!
> >
> > Which ticket number?
>
>
> ===========================================================================
> Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
> Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
> Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
> Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
> 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
> ===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 6 months
RE: evince
by Edward M
>From my understanding, the thread breaking that has been occurring has been caused by using webmail based.
I don't understand why webmail companies
Would remove those headers.
Since iam emailing from windows phone, this may break the thread. Sorry, if it does.
Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Garry T. Williams<mailto:gtwilliams@gmail.com>
Sent: 12/1/2013 4:56 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users<mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: evince
On 12-1-13 19:31:47 David wrote:
> So you are telling me that all of this time, while I have been
> dodging flack because mine works and theirs does not, that 'mine'
> works and theirs' does not? Really? Really?
>
> Please tell them. :-)
Actually, this is quite simple. An E-mail message that includes the
proper headers preserves the thread or conversation. One that does
not doesn't.
--
Garry T. Williams
--
users mailing list
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
10 years, 6 months
