[389-commits] Branch '389-ds-base-1.3.1' - ldap/servers

Mark Reynolds mreynolds at fedoraproject.org
Tue Nov 25 18:53:48 UTC 2014


 ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.c        |    6 +++--
 ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.h        |    3 ++
 ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof_config.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 250fcdbb463d2f4597a61ef1e364f71fa01ef1be
Author: Mark Reynolds <mreynolds at redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 24 16:58:57 2014 -0500

    Ticket 47963 - RFE - memberOf - add option to skip nested
     group lookups during delete operations
    
    Bug Description:  The recursive nested group lookups performed during a group delete
                      operation can take a very long time to complete if there are very
                      large static groups(groups with with over 10K members).
    
                      If there are no nested groups, then it would be nice to have an option
                      to skip the nested group check, which would significantly improve
                      delete performance.
    
    Fix Description:  Added a new memberOf plugin configuration attribute:
    
                          memberOfSkipNested: on|off
    
    https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47963
    
    Reviewed by: rmeggins(Thanks!)
    
    (cherry picked from commit b01cf4dbf9c8995081da81e39f8766d2df9e0c2d)
    
    Conflicts:
    	ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.h
    	ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof_config.c
    
    (cherry picked from commit 9cce9c4bc7b212a7c819ee2c3ea040ed5b282017)
    
    Conflicts:
    	ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.h
    	ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof_config.c

diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.c b/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.c
index da7b568..1931739 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.c
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.c
@@ -2513,8 +2513,10 @@ int memberof_fix_memberof_callback(Slapi_Entry *e, void *callback_data)
 	memberof_del_dn_data del_data = {0, config->memberof_attr};
 	Slapi_ValueSet *groups = 0;
 
-	/* get a list of all of the groups this user belongs to */
-	groups = memberof_get_groups(config, sdn);
+	if(!config->skip_nested){
+		/* get a list of all of the groups this user belongs to */
+		groups = memberof_get_groups(config, sdn);
+	}
 
 	/* If we found some groups, replace the existing memberOf attribute
 	 * with the found values.  */
diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.h b/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.h
index 65398aa..4add6f6 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.h
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.h
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
 #define MEMBEROF_GROUP_ATTR "memberOfGroupAttr"
 #define MEMBEROF_ATTR "memberOfAttr"
 #define MEMBEROF_BACKEND_ATTR "memberOfAllBackends"
+#define MEMBEROF_SKIP_NESTED_ATTR "memberOfSkipNested"
+
 #define DN_SYNTAX_OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12"
 #define NAME_OPT_UID_SYNTAX_OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.34"
 
@@ -79,6 +81,7 @@ typedef struct memberofconfig {
 	int allBackends;
 	Slapi_Filter *group_filter;
 	Slapi_Attr **group_slapiattrs;
+	int skip_nested;
 } MemberOfConfig;
 
 
diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof_config.c b/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof_config.c
index 3fd63a9..6c97c0f 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof_config.c
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof_config.c
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ memberof_validate_config (Slapi_PBlock *pb, Slapi_Entry* entryBefore, Slapi_Entr
 	Slapi_Attr *memberof_attr = NULL;
 	Slapi_Attr *group_attr = NULL;
 	char *syntaxoid = NULL;
+	char *skip_nested = NULL;
 	int not_dn_syntax = 0;
 
 	*returncode = LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM; /* be pessimistic */
@@ -244,6 +245,18 @@ memberof_validate_config (Slapi_PBlock *pb, Slapi_Entry* entryBefore, Slapi_Entr
 			MEMBEROF_GROUP_ATTR, MEMBEROF_ATTR); 
 	}
 
+	if ((skip_nested = slapi_entry_attr_get_charptr(e, MEMBEROF_SKIP_NESTED_ATTR))){
+		if(strcasecmp(skip_nested, "on") != 0 && strcasecmp(skip_nested, "off") != 0){
+			PR_snprintf(returntext, SLAPI_DSE_RETURNTEXT_SIZE,
+				"The %s configuration attribute must be set to "
+				"\"on\" or \"off\".  (illegal value: %s)",
+				MEMBEROF_SKIP_NESTED_ATTR, skip_nested);
+			*returncode = LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM;
+		}
+	}
+
+	slapi_ch_free_string(&skip_nested);
+
 	if (*returncode != LDAP_SUCCESS)
 	{
 		return SLAPI_DSE_CALLBACK_ERROR;
@@ -271,12 +284,14 @@ memberof_apply_config (Slapi_PBlock *pb, Slapi_Entry* entryBefore, Slapi_Entry*
 	int num_groupattrs = 0;
 	int groupattr_name_len = 0;
 	char *allBackends = NULL;
+	char *skip_nested = NULL;
 
 	*returncode = LDAP_SUCCESS;
 
 	groupattrs = slapi_entry_attr_get_charray(e, MEMBEROF_GROUP_ATTR);
 	memberof_attr = slapi_entry_attr_get_charptr(e, MEMBEROF_ATTR);
 	allBackends = slapi_entry_attr_get_charptr(e, MEMBEROF_BACKEND_ATTR);
+	skip_nested = slapi_entry_attr_get_charptr(e, MEMBEROF_SKIP_NESTED_ATTR);
 
 	/* We want to be sure we don't change the config in the middle of
 	 * a memberOf operation, so we obtain an exclusive lock here */
@@ -375,6 +390,14 @@ memberof_apply_config (Slapi_PBlock *pb, Slapi_Entry* entryBefore, Slapi_Entry*
 		memberof_attr = NULL; /* config now owns memory */
 	}
 
+	if (skip_nested){
+		if(strcasecmp(skip_nested,"on") == 0){
+			theConfig.skip_nested = 1;
+		} else {
+			theConfig.skip_nested = 0;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (allBackends)
 	{
 		if(strcasecmp(allBackends,"on")==0){
@@ -392,6 +415,7 @@ memberof_apply_config (Slapi_PBlock *pb, Slapi_Entry* entryBefore, Slapi_Entry*
 	slapi_ch_array_free(groupattrs);
 	slapi_ch_free_string(&memberof_attr);
 	slapi_ch_free_string(&allBackends);
+	slapi_ch_free_string(&skip_nested);
 
 	if (*returncode != LDAP_SUCCESS)
 	{
@@ -464,6 +488,10 @@ memberof_copy_config(MemberOfConfig *dest, MemberOfConfig *src)
 			dest->memberof_attr = slapi_ch_strdup(src->memberof_attr);
 		}
 
+		if(src->skip_nested){
+			dest->skip_nested = src->skip_nested;
+		}
+
 		if(src->allBackends)
 		{
 			dest->allBackends = src->allBackends;




More information about the 389-commits mailing list