[389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

Rich Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Wed Sep 29 19:49:10 UTC 2010


Gary Morris wrote:
> ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. 
>
> [root at dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389
> 389-dsgw-1.1.5-1.fc13.x86_64
> 389-admin-console-1.1.5-1.fc13.noarch
> 389-admin-1.1.11-1.fc13.x86_64
> 389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.x86_64
> 389-ds-console-1.2.3-1.fc13.noarch
> 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.5-1.fc13.noarch
> 389-console-1.1.4-1.fc13.noarch
> 389-adminutil-1.1.9-1.fc13.x86_64
> 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.3-1.fc13.noarch
> 389-ds-1.2.1-1.fc13.noarch
>
> I got some gdb output. I tried 5 times and got 3 distinct functions.. 
> the output in order is below:
So 1.2.6.1 is still crashing :-(
in gdb, do this:
thread apply all bt
and post the output here
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7f81897fb710 (LWP 5328)]
> 0x00007f81adc5be28 in attrlist_delete () from 
> /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
> (gdb) 
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7f4012dea710 (LWP 6263)]
> 0x00007f40432ca01c in attrlist_find_or_create_locking_optional () from 
> /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
> (gdb) 
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7fe3b03f9710 (LWP 6778)]
> 0x00007fe3d6f3aea1 in valuearray_add_valuearray_fast () from 
> /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
> (gdb) 
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7f5c31bf5710 (LWP 7275)]
> 0x00007f5c59549ea1 in valuearray_add_valuearray_fast () from 
> /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
> (gdb) 
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7ff0485e6710 (LWP 7556)]
> 0x00007ff079a4e01c in attrlist_find_or_create_locking_optional () from 
> /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
>
> I'm happy to assist in any way I can to resolve.
>
> much thanks!
> -gary
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com 
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Gary Morris wrote:
>     >
>     > ok.. it pulled 389-ds-base-1.2.6-2.fc13.x86_64.. is that ok or do i
>     > need to be on 1.2.6-1?  On 1.2.6-2 I'm having the same problem.  As
>     > soon as I start an application that is ldap intensive, the directory
>     > server crashes real quick.  No errors of any sort reported.
>     No, it should be 1.2.6.1-1, not 1.2.6-1, not 1.2.6-2.
>     Looks like 1.2.6.1-1 is not yet in the mirrors, so if you want to
>     try it
>     in the meantime, you'll have to install it directly from koji:
>     http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=196612
>     >
>     > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Rich Megginson
>     <rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>
>     > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Gary Morris wrote:
>     >     > Hi guys.. i'm running 389-ds-base-1.2.6-1.fc13.x86_64 and
>     the server
>     >     > is crashing repeatedly, mostly under load.  There are
>     about 390,000
>     >     > ldap entries in the database. I tried installing on a
>     couple of
>     >     > different servers (Fedora 13) with the same problem.  The
>     >     problem does
>     >     > not seem to be happening on 1.2.6-0.1.  I would be happy
>     to send you
>     >     > more details on what is causing the crash if I could
>     figure out
>     >     how to
>     >     > do that.  When I put any load on the server, it crashes,
>     and often
>     >     > crashes before it can even fully start.  It does not seem
>     to crash
>     >     > when I turn on the heavy debugging, but then again,
>     performance is
>     >     > very slow on full debug.  If anyone has some suggestions
>     on what
>     >     I can
>     >     > do to give more information, i'd be happy to.
>     >     There were a couple of crashing bugs that have been fixed in
>     >     1.2.6.1-1 -
>     >     now available in the Testing repos.  Please try to install
>     >     389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-1 from the updates-testing repo and see
>     if that
>     >     fixes your problem.
>     >     >
>     >     > -gary
>     >     >
>     >    
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >
>     >     > --
>     >     > 389-devel mailing list
>     >     > 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     >     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
>     >     > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     389-devel mailing list
>     >     389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     >     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
>     >     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > --
>     > 389-devel mailing list
>     > 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>
>     --
>     389-devel mailing list
>     389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel



More information about the 389-devel mailing list