[389-devel] Please review lib389 ticket 47578: removal of 'sudo' and absolute path in lib389

thierry bordaz tbordaz at redhat.com
Wed Oct 30 20:12:09 UTC 2013


Ok I realise it is not a good idea. I will reimplement it and send an 
other review :-)
Thanks for all your feedbacks.

thierry

On 10/30/2013 08:11 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 12:56 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
>> Hello Thierry,
>>
>> layout OK.
>>
>> As for tests - instead of reinventing the wheel by defing class 
>> Test_standAlone
>> to set up instance, use py.test fixture.
> +1
>>
>> Also, you should not force setup, test, teardown execution for each 
>> test by
>> specifying sub-methods for each test. Testing framework (py.test) 
>> should be
>> doing that. I think this will make your tests fail badly if some 
>> exception
>> occurs - if _test_ticket47560_setup raises exception, it will 
>> propagate back to
>> py.test and cleanup method will never be executed for that ticket.
> +1
>>
>> Also, I believe each ticket should have its own file which contains 
>> one or more
>> testcases. I think that would reasonably group relevant things together.
> +1
>>
>> On 10/30/2013 05:57 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47578/0001-Ticket-47578-CI-tests-removal-of-sudo-and-absolute-p.patch 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 389-devel mailing list
>>> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>>>
>> -- 
>> 389-devel mailing list
>> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>



More information about the 389-devel mailing list