<div>Thank you for information. I have fixed the issue finally once i run the authconfig and configured ldap server details.</div> <div> </div> <div>Now i have a problem! when i try to add windows clinet machine in FDS it give a error message. <BR><BR><B><I>fedora-directory-users-request@redhat.com</I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to<BR>fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users<BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>fedora-directory-users-request@redhat.com<BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>fedora-directory-users-owner@redhat.com<BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users
digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR>1. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within<BR>the same domain (Daryle A. Tilroe)<BR>2. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within<BR>the same domain (Richard Megginson)<BR>3. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within<BR>the same domain (Daryle A. Tilroe)<BR>4. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within<BR>the same domain (Richard Megginson)<BR>5. Regarding fds with samba (surendhar surya)<BR>6. No X (Vampire D)<BR>7. Re: Regarding fds with samba (Ivan Ferreira)<BR>8. Re: No X (Richard Megginson)<BR>9. add new customer to Quickbooks from Directory Server<BR>(Darren Fulton - CTI)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:30:11 -0600<BR>From: "Daryle A. Tilroe" <DARYLE@MICRALYNE.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two<BR>Directory Servers
within the same domain<BR>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."<BR><FEDORA-DIRECTORY-USERS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Message-ID: <46926293.2070806@micralyne.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed<BR><BR>Joel Heenan wrote:<BR><BR>> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 00:14 +1000, Richard Megginson wrote:<BR>> <BR>>>How did you create your directory server instances? Usually the first <BR>>>one you create is your Configuration Directory Server, the one the <BR>>>console uses as sort of a network registry (the o=NetscapeRoot suffix). <BR>>>Subsequent directory server instance creation should use this one <BR>>>instead of creating a new Config DS. The setup program should give you <BR>>>these options.<BR><BR>I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple<BR>dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers<BR>for the same DB? I tried just replicating
NetscapeRoot but I ended up<BR>with things messed up. I have not yet tried again but was curious<BR>if there was a 'correct' method. Otherwise I was just going to have<BR>the two be independent insofar as the config DB went. I require<BR>this so either will be completely, and indefinitely, functional when<BR>the other is down.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Daryle A. Tilroe<BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:29:19 -0600<BR>From: Richard Megginson <RMEGGINS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two<BR>Directory Servers within the same domain<BR>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."<BR><FEDORA-DIRECTORY-USERS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Message-ID: <4692625F.2030205@redhat.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:<BR>> Joel Heenan wrote:<BR>><BR>>> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 00:14 +1000, Richard Megginson
wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>> How did you create your directory server instances? Usually the <BR>>>> first one you create is your Configuration Directory Server, the one <BR>>>> the console uses as sort of a network registry (the o=NetscapeRoot <BR>>>> suffix). Subsequent directory server instance creation should use <BR>>>> this one instead of creating a new Config DS. The setup program <BR>>>> should give you these options.<BR>><BR>> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple<BR>> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers<BR>> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up<BR>> with things messed up.<BR>How so?<BR>> I have not yet tried again but was curious<BR>> if there was a 'correct' method.<BR>Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the config <BR>DS are hard coded, and there is not really a
provision for specifying <BR>more than one for failover.<BR>> Otherwise I was just going to have<BR>> the two be independent insofar as the config DB went. I require<BR>> this so either will be completely, and indefinitely, functional when<BR>> the other is down.<BR>><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<BR>Name: smime.p7s<BR>Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature<BR>Size: 3245 bytes<BR>Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature<BR>Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070709/c3cda3ee/smime.bin<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 3<BR>Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:52:05 -0600<BR>From: "Daryle A. Tilroe" <DARYLE@MICRALYNE.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two<BR>Directory Servers within the same domain<BR>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."<BR><FEDORA-DIRECTORY-USERS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Message-ID:
<469267B5.6090607@micralyne.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed<BR><BR>Richard Megginson wrote:<BR><BR>> Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:<BR>> <BR>>> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple<BR>>> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers<BR>>> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up<BR>>> with things messed up.<BR>> <BR>> How so?<BR><BR>It was a couple weeks ago but IIRC the admin server on the second<BR>master would not run properly. I will really have to try it again<BR>to confirm.<BR><BR>>> I have not yet tried again but was curious<BR>>> if there was a 'correct' method.<BR>> <BR>> Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the config <BR>> DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for specifying <BR>> more than one for failover.<BR><BR>So basically I should have my
two multimasters run independent admin<BR>servers? I did notice that I can admin the other "independent"<BR>secondary master with the 'left over' entry in the config DB of<BR>the primary (it was left there after I redid the secondary since<BR>the I left the primary). This suggests I could probably add each<BR>of the two master to each other's config DB manually. I'm not really<BR>sure that this is even useful though in a small install. Probably<BR>best to leave them as separate admin servers with the userRoot<BR>replicated; that seems to work just fine.<BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Daryle A. Tilroe<BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 4<BR>Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:49:07 -0600<BR>From: Richard Megginson <RMEGGINS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Admin Server connecting to two<BR>Directory Servers within the same domain<BR>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
project."<BR><FEDORA-DIRECTORY-USERS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Message-ID: <46926703.1040305@redhat.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:<BR>> Richard Megginson wrote:<BR>><BR>>> Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple<BR>>>> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers<BR>>>> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up<BR>>>> with things messed up.<BR>>><BR>>> How so?<BR>><BR>> It was a couple weeks ago but IIRC the admin server on the second<BR>> master would not run properly. I will really have to try it again<BR>> to confirm.<BR>><BR>>>> I have not yet tried again but was curious<BR>>>> if there was a 'correct' method.<BR>>><BR>>> Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the
<BR>>> config DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for <BR>>> specifying more than one for failover.<BR>><BR>> So basically I should have my two multimasters run independent admin<BR>> servers? I did notice that I can admin the other "independent"<BR>> secondary master with the 'left over' entry in the config DB of<BR>> the primary (it was left there after I redid the secondary since<BR>> the I left the primary). This suggests I could probably add each<BR>> of the two master to each other's config DB manually.<BR>Yes, you could do that too.<BR>> I'm not really<BR>> sure that this is even useful though in a small install. Probably<BR>> best to leave them as separate admin servers with the userRoot<BR>> replicated; that seems to work just fine.<BR>><BR>><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<BR>Name: smime.p7s<BR>Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature<BR>Size: 3245
bytes<BR>Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature<BR>Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070709/a50e6030/smime.bin<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 5<BR>Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:15:46 +0100 (BST)<BR>From: surendhar surya <SURENDHARSURYA@YAHOO.CO.IN><BR>Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] Regarding fds with samba<BR>To: fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<BR>Message-ID: <89864.12273.qm@web8903.mail.in.yahoo.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>I have installed fedora directory server and i tried to integreate with samba.<BR><BR>When i tried to groupmap using this command. I get a error message. what will be the problem. can anyone provide me a solution.?<BR><BR>[root@fds ~]# net groupmap add rid=512 ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup="Domain Admins"<BR>Can't lookup UNIX group Domain Admins<BR><BR><BR><BR>Thanks and Regard <BR>Surendhar
P<BR>Chennai<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>---------------------------------<BR>Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.<BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/4b014e42/attachment.html<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 6<BR>Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:08:13 -0400<BR>From: "Vampire D" <VAMPIRED@GMAIL.COM><BR>Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] No X<BR>To: fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<BR>Message-ID:<BR><4ca8a4870707100808o12705142me70ea9af5cbf7a13@mail.gmail.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Is there anything you cannot do with FDS when using the HTTP Control<BR>Panel rather than using the X Windows Java Control Panel?<BR><BR>Is it highly recommended to use the X Windows Java Control Panel in<BR>production?<BR><BR>-- <BR>"Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested
because they look<BR>just like the criminal they are playing?"<BR><BR>Christopher<BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/3bf15536/attachment.html<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 7<BR>Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:22:30 -0400<BR>From: Ivan Ferreira <IFERREIR@PERSONAL.COM.PY><BR>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Regarding fds with samba<BR>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."<BR><FEDORA-DIRECTORY-USERS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Cc: fedora-directory-users@redhat.com,<BR>fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com<BR>Message-ID:<BR><OF84F6EE98.9D46BACB-ON84257314.00544BAB-84257314.00543D58@PERSONAL.COM.PY><BR><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<BR><BR>You have to creaete the "Domain Admins" Unix Group (PosixGroup) in the<BR>Directory Server.<BR><BR>If you already created id, check if you can list
the group with:<BR><BR>getent group<BR><BR>If you cannot see the "Domain Admins" unix group, then you have a problem<BR>with your LDAP client conrfuration, check ldap.conf.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Para <BR>fedora-directory-users@redhat.co <BR>m <BR>surendhar surya cc <BR><SURENDHARSURYA@YAHOO.CO <br>.in> Asunto <BR>Enviado por: [Fedora-directory-users] <BR>fedora-directory-users-b Regarding fds with samba <BR>ounces@redhat.com Clasificación <BR>Uso Interno <BR>10/07/2007 06:15 a.m. <BR><BR><BR><BR>Por favor, responda a <BR>"General discussion list <BR>for the Fedora Directory <BR>server project." <BR><FEDORA-DIRECTORY-USERS@ <br>redhat.com> <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>I have installed fedora directory server and i tried to integreate with<BR>samba.<BR><BR>When i tried to groupmap using this command. I get a error message. what<BR>will be the problem. can anyone provide me a solution.?<BR><BR>[root@fds ~]# net groupmap add rid=512 ntgroup="Domain
Admins"<BR>unixgroup="Domain Admins"<BR>Can't lookup UNIX group Domain Admins<BR><BR><BR><BR>Thanks and Regard<BR>Surendhar P<BR>Chennai<BR><BR><BR>Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.<BR>--<BR>Fedora-directory-users mailing list<BR>Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<BR>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>========================================================================================<BR>AVISO LEGAL: Esta información es privada y confidencial y está dirigida<BR>únicamente a su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario original de<BR>este mensaje y por este medio pudo acceder a dicha información por favor<BR>elimine el mensaje. La distribución o copia de este mensaje está<BR>estrictamente prohibida. Esta comunicación es sólo para propósitos de<BR>información y no debe ser considerada como propuesta, aceptación ni como<BR>una declaración de voluntad oficial de NUCLEO S.A. La
transmisión de<BR>e-mails no garantiza que el correo electrónico sea seguro o libre de error.<BR>Por consiguiente, no manifestamos que esta información sea completa o<BR>precisa. Toda información está sujeta a alterarse sin previo aviso.<BR><BR>This information is private and confidential and intended for the<BR>recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you<BR>are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or<BR>copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for<BR>information purposes only and shall not be regarded neither as a proposal,<BR>acceptance nor as a statement of will or official statement from NUCLEO<BR>S.A. . Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.<BR>Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or<BR>accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is<BR>subject to change without
notice.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 8<BR>Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:27:12 -0600<BR>From: Richard Megginson <RMEGGINS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] No X<BR>To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."<BR><FEDORA-DIRECTORY-USERS@REDHAT.COM><BR>Message-ID: <4693A550.4060309@redhat.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Vampire D wrote:<BR>> Is there anything you cannot do with FDS when using the HTTP Control <BR>> Panel rather than using the X Windows Java Control Panel?<BR>The HTTP control panel (aka phonebook/gateway or admin express) just <BR>allows limited user/group management, server log viewing, and server <BR>start/stop. The Java Control Panel (aka console) allows you do perform <BR>all aspects of server, user, and group management.<BR>> <BR>> Is it highly recommended to use the X Windows Java Control Panel in <BR>> production?<BR>If you
require a management GUI, then yes. All administration can be <BR>performed via the command line and via LDAP.<BR>><BR>> -- <BR>> "Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they <BR>> look just like the criminal they are playing?"<BR>><BR>> Christopher<BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>><BR>> --<BR>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list<BR>> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<BR>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users<BR>> <BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<BR>Name: smime.p7s<BR>Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature<BR>Size: 3245 bytes<BR>Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature<BR>Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/2cbdf6dc/smime.bin<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 9<BR>Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:44:29 -0500<BR>From: Darren
Fulton - CTI <DFULTON@CONCEPTTECHNOLOGYINC.COM><BR>Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] add new customer to Quickbooks from<BR>Directory Server<BR>To: Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<BR>Message-ID: <4693A95D.10409@concepttechnologyinc.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<BR><BR>Disclaimer: Shot in the dark and possibly off-topic. <BR><BR>Situation: We add client contacts to our Fedora Directory Server. The <BR>billing department has to also manually add client contacts into <BR>Quickbooks to generate bills and such.<BR><BR>Goal: Make it so the client contacts only have to be manually added <BR>into only one system.<BR><BR>Proposed Solutions: Make Quickbooks look for clients in the directory <BR>_or_ create a simple way to export from the directory client contact <BR>info (I think Quickbooks uses an IIF file). [BTW, wouldn't it be cool <BR>if there was a link in Directory Express web app to generate this like <BR>the vCard
link?]<BR><BR>Question for List: <BR>Has anybody had any experience getting either of these done that they <BR>would like to share? <BR><BR>Final Disclaimer: Google searches revealed one or more commercial <BR>third-party applications that allow Quickbooks to "integrate" with <BR>LDAP. A quick look at these programs didn't impress me, but I have <BR>_not_ tested them. Google searches also revealed a Finance::IIF perl <BR>module that I will keep in mind. Thank you for any input.<BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Best Regards,<BR><BR>Darren Fulton<BR>Concept Technology, Inc.<BR>1106 17th Avenue South<BR>Nashville, TN 37212<BR><BR>Phone - 615.321.6428 Ext. 105<BR>Fax - 615.321.5598<BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>--<BR>Fedora-directory-users mailing list<BR>Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<BR>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users<BR><BR><BR>End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue
9<BR>*****************************************************<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR><DIV> <DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#111111>Thanks and Regard <BR></FONT></STRONG><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" face="comic sans ms" color=#111111><FONT face=arial>Surendhar P</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" face="comic sans ms" color=#111111><FONT face=arial>Chennai</FONT></FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV><p> 
<!--4--><hr size=1></hr> 5, 50, 500, 5000. Store N number of mails in your inbox. <a href="http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_4/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/">Click here.</a>