I was under the impression FDS was better implementation than OpenLDAP in terms of Performance, Reliability, and especially replication?<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Gordon Messmer</b> <<a href="mailto:yinyang@eburg.com">yinyang@eburg.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Richard Megginson wrote:<br>> Vampire D wrote:<br>>> As I understand it, OpenLDAP doesn't perform all that well under a
<br>>> high load.<br>> OpenLDAP 2.3 does.<br><br>Howard Chu's "SambaXP" key notes certainly seem to make that argument.<br>He makes the bold claim that "OpenLDAP is the only directory software<br>
that matters."<br><br>Do you agree? Is there a future for Fedora DS, or will OpenLDAP own the<br>Free Software directory service market? Will the two projects share<br>technology and converge?<br><br><br>--<br>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com">Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com</a><br><a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look just like the criminal they are playing?"<br><br>Christopher<br>