<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Rich, <br>
<br>
We're about to start testing an implementation of FDS-1.1.1, but we
have a query about packaging dates:<br>
<br>
The update RPMs available for Fedora 8 (which we plan to use) seem to
have build dates prior to this release announcement. Is this to be
expected, e.g. did the F8 RPMs get built prior to release but with the
release code? We just want to make sure we're using the best possible
code here.<br>
<br>
Many TIA,<br>
<br>
Danny<br>
<br>
Rich Megginson wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:484E9F11.6080701@redhat.com" type="cite">We are
pleased to announce the release of Fedora Directory Server 1.1.1. This
release is primarily a bug fix release, but does contain some new
features, mostly to support freeIPA.
<br>
<br>
Binary packages are available for Fedora 7, 8, 9, and rawhide. NOTE:
Fedora 6/RHEL5 binaries are not yet available. They will be shortly.
<br>
<br>
How to upgrade:
<br>
<br>
yum upgrade fedora-ds-base
<br>
<br>
No further setup should be required. This should restart the server -
if not, a manual restart (service dirsrv restart) is required for the
new code to take effect.
<br>
<br>
* Release Notes - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes">http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes</a>
<br>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com">Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>