OK; opened: <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571677">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571677</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/3/9 Rich Megginson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com">rmeggins@redhat.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:<br>
> One note, we have servers with version 1.1.3 and servers that have<br>
> been upgraded to version 1.2.5. Only the servers that have been<br>
> upgraded to 1.2.5 are showing the busy replica error, not those with<br>
> version 1.1.3. Hope this could help.<br>
</div>Please file a bug. Does this happen every time you attempt to delete a<br>
replication conflict entry? Does it happen with any other sort of<br>
entry? This began happening with 1.2.5?<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> Regards.<br>
><br>
><br>
> El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:50, Juan Asensio Sánchez <<a href="mailto:okelet@gmail.com">okelet@gmail.com</a><br>
</div>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:okelet@gmail.com">okelet@gmail.com</a>>> escribió:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">><br>
> These are the messages when enabling replication logs:<br>
><br>
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525<br>
> op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Replica in use<br>
> locking_purl=conn=207283 id=3<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525<br>
> op=11 replica="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Unable to acquire<br>
> replica: error: replica busy locked by conn=207283 id=3 for<br>
> incremental update<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525<br>
> op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX":<br>
> StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=1 rc=0<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525<br>
> op=13 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Begin incremental protocol<br>
><br>
> These are all the messages in the access.log referring the<br>
> connection conn=207283<br>
><br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 fd=607 slot=607 SSL<br>
> connection from XXXXXX to XXXXXX<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 SSL 256-bit AES<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 BIND<br>
> dn="cn=Replication Manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97<br>
> nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config"<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0<br>
> filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101<br>
> nentries=1 etime=0<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0<br>
> filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101<br>
> nentries=1 etime=0<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 EXT<br>
> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3" name="Netscape Replication Start<br>
> Session"<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120<br>
> nentries=0 etime=0<br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL<br>
> dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX"<br>
><br>
> And no more... As you can see, the replica is busy since 8:16 (now<br>
> is 16:51, in Spain). I am locked :S.<br>
><br>
><br>
> El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:44, Juan Asensio Sánchez<br>
</div></div>> <<a href="mailto:okelet@gmail.com">okelet@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:okelet@gmail.com">okelet@gmail.com</a>>> escribió:<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or<br>
> error logs, in supplier or consumers. Last modification<br>
> operation in the busy replica/database is:<br>
><br>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL<br>
> dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXX"<br>
><br>
> which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled<br>
> replication logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon<br>
> i get them, i will post.<br>
><br>
> Regards.<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2010/3/8 Rich Megginson <<a href="mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com">rmeggins@redhat.com</a><br>
</div>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com">rmeggins@redhat.com</a>>><br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">><br>
> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:<br>
> > Hi all<br>
> ><br>
> > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it<br>
> is wirking<br>
> > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have<br>
> found some<br>
> > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have<br>
> deleted them<br>
> > manually, and now the databases in the other servers are<br>
> busy all the<br>
> > time, no matter if i restart the service in the source<br>
> or target<br>
> > servers (i must kill the target servers as they never<br>
> stop), when the<br>
> > replication agreement is launched again from the source<br>
> server, the<br>
> > replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the<br>
> access log of<br>
> > the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in<br>
> conflict,<br>
> > which never gets a result.<br>
> Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the consumers?<br>
> ><br>
> > any idea?<br>
> ><br>
> > As other times, thanks in advance for your help.<br>
> ><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > 389 users mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
</div></div>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a>><br>
<div class="im">> > <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users</a><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> 389 users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
</div>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a>><br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> 389 users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users</a><br>
<br>
--<br>
389 users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br>