Hi<br><br>We also have about 30 VMs running Centos 5 and 389 DS without any problem of resources, with a directory of about 55000 entries (VMWare ESX Server), all replicated. Also, real machines.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2010/7/13 Daniel Maher <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dma%2B389users@witbe.net">dma+389users@witbe.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 07/13/2010 01:26 AM, Barry Sitompul wrote:<br>
<br>
> Has anyone had the experience of running the DS on a VM?<br>
><br>
> I've got one set up running on a RHEL VM and it looks like the virtual<br>
> memory usage keeps going up and stays up with every LDAP query (I just<br>
> use top).<br>
><br>
> I'm not sure if this is caused by the application problem or this is<br>
> expected RHEL behaviour?<br>
<br>
</div>Which RHEL ? Which architecture ? What sort of VM environment ?<br>
<br>
I've ben running test case of 389 1.2.5 on CentOS 5.5 x86_64 (host &<br>
guest) in a VirtualBox, and i've had no problems such as those you've<br>
described.<br>
<br></blockquote></div>