<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>Juan,<br><br>The winsync utility is not designed to write to the same ou in 389, can you separate the sync agreements into two different OU's or databases? I'm making the assumption that you are making the agreements to the same OU in 389. If you're not writing to the same OU, can you go into more detail about the design? <br><br>Dan<br><br><hr id="zwchr"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Juan Asensio Sánchez" <okelet@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:09:41 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>[389-users] AD replication agreement with 2 different servers/domains<br><br>Hi<br><br>I am trying to configure the replication between 389DS an two<br>different servers and domains in Active Directory. The first<br>replication agreement works fine, and the second works fine too in the<br>initialization. But when I modify some user, the change is replicated<br>to the first server/domain, but not to the second ones. I think this<br>is due to the first agreement has created the objectGUID in AD, and<br>replicated to 389DS in the ntUniqueId attribute, but with the second<br>agreement, the second server domain has created a different objectGUID<br>but not replicated/overwrote the previous ntUniqueId created by the<br>first agreement (that then would break the first agreement). Is this<br>correct? Is there any way to solve/workaround this?<br><br>Regard and thanks in advance.<br>--<br>389 users mailing list<br>389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org<br>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users</div><br></div></body></html>