<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/16/2013 01:23 AM, Mitja Mihelič
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:51E4F4DB.7040309@arnes.si" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/15/2013 05:28 PM, Rich
        Megginson wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:51E41532.4060906@redhat.com" type="cite">
        <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
          http-equiv="Content-Type">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/15/2013 02:57 AM, Mitja
          Mihelič wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote cite="mid:51E3B96C.4000706@arnes.si" type="cite">
          <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
            http-equiv="Content-Type">
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/12/2013 05:55 PM, Rich
            Megginson wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote cite="mid:51E026FE.5030402@redhat.com" type="cite">
            <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
              http-equiv="Content-Type">
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/12/2013 08:22 AM, Mitja
              Mihelič wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote cite="mid:51E0110C.8080603@arnes.si" type="cite">
              <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                http-equiv="Content-Type">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/09/2013 03:34 PM, Rich
                Megginson wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote cite="mid:51DC1167.6040809@redhat.com"
                type="cite">
                <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                  http-equiv="Content-Type">
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/09/2013 06:43 AM,
                  Mitja Mihelič wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote cite="mid:51DC058E.2090202@arnes.si"
                  type="cite">
                  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                    http-equiv="Content-Type">
                  Hi!<br>
                  <br>
                  We are having problems with some our 389-DS instances.
                  They crash after receiving an update from the
                  provider.<br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                After looking at the stack trace, I think this is <a
                  moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47391">https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47391</a><br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
          Yes, it looks like it might be it. When CONSUMER_ONE crashed
          for the first time, the last thing replicated was a password
          change.<br>
          Do you perhaps know, where I could get a 389DS version for
          Centos6 that has the patch? The ticket says it was pushed to
          1.2.11, but would seem that our 1.2.11.15-14 is still an
          unpatched one and the repositories do not have any newer
          versions.<br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        Is that the 389-ds-base that is included with CentOS6?<br>
      </blockquote>
      Yes, the 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.x86_64 and
      389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.x86_64 are from the official
      Centos6 updates repoository.<br>
      389-ds-base-debuginfo is from <a moz-do-not-send="true"
        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/">http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/</a><br>
      The rest are from epel.<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Looking at the stack trace you sent earlier - there is only 1
    thread?  You ran <br>
    <pre>gdb -ex 'set confirm off' -ex 'set pagination off' -ex 'thread apply all bt full' -ex 'quit' /usr/sbin/ns-slapd `pidof ns-slapd` &gt; stacktrace.`date +%s`.txt 2&gt;&amp;1


?  If so, I have no idea what's going on - I've never seen the server deadlock itself with only 1 thread . . .
</pre>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:51E4F4DB.7040309@arnes.si" type="cite">
      <blockquote cite="mid:51E41532.4060906@redhat.com" type="cite"> <br>
        <blockquote cite="mid:51E3B96C.4000706@arnes.si" type="cite">
          <blockquote cite="mid:51E026FE.5030402@redhat.com" type="cite">
            <blockquote cite="mid:51E0110C.8080603@arnes.si" type="cite">
              <blockquote cite="mid:51DC1167.6040809@redhat.com"
                type="cite"> <br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:51DC058E.2090202@arnes.si"
                  type="cite"> The crash happened twice after about a
                  week of running without problems. The crashes happened
                  on two consumer servers but not at the same time.<br>
                  The servers are running CentOS 6x with the following
                  389DS packages installed:<br>
                  389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch<br>
                  389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch<br>
                  389-adminutil-1.1.15-1.el6.x86_64<br>
                  389-dsgw-1.1.10-1.el6.x86_64<br>
                  389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.x86_64<br>
                  389-admin-1.1.29-1.el6.x86_64<br>
                  389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch<br>
                  389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch<br>
                  389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch<br>
                  389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.x86_64<br>
                  389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.x86_64<br>
                  389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch<br>
                  <br>
                  We are in the process of replacing the Centos 5x base
                  consumer+provider setup with a CentOS 6x base one. For
                  the time being, the CentOS 6 machines are acting as
                  consumers for the old server. They run for a while and
                  then the replicated instances crash though not at the
                  same time.<br>
                  One of the servers did not want to start after the
                  crash,</blockquote>
                <br>
                Can you provide the error messages from the errors log?<br>
              </blockquote>
              I have attached error logs from the provider
              (2013-06-27-provider_error) and the consumer
              (2013-06-27-server_two_error) in question.<br>
              <blockquote cite="mid:51DC1167.6040809@redhat.com"
                type="cite"> <br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:51DC058E.2090202@arnes.si"
                  type="cite">so I have run db2index on its database.
                  It's been running for four days and it has still not
                  finished. </blockquote>
                <br>
                Try exporting using db2ldif, then importing using
                ldif2db.<br>
              </blockquote>
              The export process hangs. After an hour strace still
              shows:<br>
              futex(0x7f5822670ed4, FUTEX_WAIT, 1, NULL<br>
              The error log for this is attached as
              2013-07-10-server_two-ldif_import_hangs.<br>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            Are you using db2ldif or db2ldif.pl?  If you are using
            db2ldif, is the server running?  If not, please try first
            shutting down the server and use db2ldif.<br>
            <br>
            If db2ldif still hangs, then please follow the instructions
            at <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
              href="http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Hangs">http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Hangs</a>
            to get a stack trace of the hung process.<br>
          </blockquote>
          I was using db2ldif with the server shut down. I tried it
          again and it hung. The LDIF file was created but its size was
          zero. The produced stack trace is attached as
          server_two-db2ldif_hang-stacktrace.1373877200.txt.<br>
          <br>
          <blockquote cite="mid:51E026FE.5030402@redhat.com" type="cite">
            <br>
            <blockquote cite="mid:51E0110C.8080603@arnes.si" type="cite">
              <br>
              <blockquote cite="mid:51DC1167.6040809@redhat.com"
                type="cite"> <br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:51DC058E.2090202@arnes.si"
                  type="cite">All I get from db2index now are these
                  outputs:<br>
                  [09/Jul/2013:13:29:11 +0200] - reindex db: Processed
                  65095 entries (pass 1104) -- average rate
                  53686277.5/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0%<br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                How many entries do you have in your database?<br>
              </blockquote>
              The number revolves around 65400. It varies perhaps 2 user
              del/add operations a month and 20 attribute changes per
              week, if that.<br>
              <blockquote cite="mid:51DC1167.6040809@redhat.com"
                type="cite"> <br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:51DC058E.2090202@arnes.si"
                  type="cite"> <br>
                  The other instance did start up, but the replication
                  process did not work anymore. I disabled the
                  replication to this host and set it up again. I chose
                  "Initialize consumer now" and the consumer crashed
                  every time.</blockquote>
                <br>
                Can provide a stack trace of the core when the server
                crashes?  This may be different than the stack trace
                below.<br>
              </blockquote>
              The last provided stack trace was produced at the last
              server crash. I will provide another stack trace when
              CONSUMER_ONE crashes again. Currently it refuses to crash
              at initialization time and keeps running.<br>
              <blockquote cite="mid:51DC1167.6040809@redhat.com"
                type="cite"> <br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:51DC058E.2090202@arnes.si"
                  type="cite">I have enabled full error logging and
                  could find nothing.<br>
                  I have read a few threads (not all, I admit) on this
                  list and
                  <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
                    charset=UTF-8">
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Crashes">http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Crashes</a>
                  and tried to troubleshoot.<br>
                  <br>
                  The crash produced the attached core dump and I could
                  use your help with understanding it. As well as any
                  help with the crash. If more info is needed I will
                  gladly provide it.<br>
                  <br>
                  Regards, Mitja<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                  <br>
                  <pre wrap="">--
389 users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users</a></pre>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>