<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/03/2014 01:35 PM, Michael Gettes
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:62572CA3-EDB0-46A6-808A-24B5B4341311@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Yeah, I hear what you’re saying. 47758 is due to running bleeding
edge, i get it. but i had to go there cuz I was having problems
with objects getting messed up with .15 in production and even .25
in test and I went to .28 which had the SASL fix on top of .26
which fixed all object problems. The object problems were the
emails I sent to the list indicating objects I couldn’t delete or
modify and .28 fixed those problems. This is where i feel i was a
little trapped and had to come forward to the bleeding edge.
there was a method to my madness and didn’t this just willy nilly
and hence where i was hoping for .29 to i might have a good mix of
things - even if it was on the bleeding edge. i hope this makes
sense.</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, and we are working on fixing those issues in EL6.6. So perhaps
when EL6.6 is released you will be able to use the OS packages.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:62572CA3-EDB0-46A6-808A-24B5B4341311@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>/mrg</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>
<div>On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Rich Megginson <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com">rmeggins@redhat.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;
font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant:
normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;
line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start;
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space:
normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display:
inline !important;">And that problem is entirely due to
running "bleeding edge" software - a new patch/feature
urgently requested to be in EL6.6 that we didn't
completely backport to epel6. If you were running the
standard 389-ds-base in EL6.5 you would not have seen
this issue. The 389-ds-base in epel6 contains patches
intended for EL6.6 but which have not yet been fully
tested. The only way you could get into a real bind is
if you have run into an issue due to be fixed in EL6.6
that you urgently need and can't wait for it to be
released through the usual EL6.6 channels.</span></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">--
389 users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org">389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>