Appointment of Board Members.
John Poelstra
poelstra at redhat.com
Mon Aug 16 14:09:47 UTC 2010
Toshio Kuratomi said the following on 08/13/2010 01:48 PM Pacific Time:
> Notes:
> * In the Max Spevack era, the Board was pushed away from making decisions
> for two reasons: 1) FESCo was deemed to be the body that understood the
> technical issues at hand and therefore the body that should make most of
> the decisions regarding Fedora. 2) The Board was not all elected and
> therefore didn't have as much of a "mandate from the people". In the Paul
> Frields era, the Board started to make many more decisions. I don't think
> that's necessarily a good thing as they've trampled all over reason #1
> above but being fully elected would help to alleviate reason #2.
I don't recall things going down this way. Please name some concrete
examples of this "trampling" so we can be discussing the same thing.
John
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list