[Ambassadors] Runoff election for Board seat has begun.

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Jun 13 04:17:23 UTC 2012


On 06/12/2012 04:34 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> Well there are several aspects of the election process that don't seem
> fair and reasonable to me from general and community perspective so
> let's agree on disagreeing on this topic.
>
> In essence I would think we would want to have the greatest diversity in
> our governing structure otherwise this election will essential still
> just be popularity contest and feel unwelcome ( and with impossible odds
> ) to new people that want to participate in it.
>
> I would think it was a fair rule to be able to run for all governing
> body's ( as long as you are not serving in one ) then choose which one
> you will serve should you get elected to more then one and the runner(s)
> up would grab that/those seat(s) that the individual chose to leave behind.
>
> And in addition to the above I feel that we should have a limit on how
> many terms the same individual can serve in the same governing body to
> ensure we always have rotation on new people that bring in fresh
> perspective, fresh approaches and fresh ideas in those governing body's.

If we consistently had a /lot/ of candidates who were being passed over 
by the "popular" ones, maybe you'd have an argument.  Given that we're 
seeing a struggle to get /anybody/ to fill the open seats and are often 
voting where there is 1 extra candidate beyond seats to fill I really 
don't thing adding any additional barriers to those seats is going to 
improve matters.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!


More information about the advisory-board mailing list