Connotation analysis for Fedora Project codenames

[Robyn Bergeron]

On 03/26/2012 04:46 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/26/2012 06:45 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> 18 release name vote to find out if
>> there's a majority of (voting) contributors who would like the 
>> release name
>> to simply go away.
>
> Has it been looked into how many ( % ) of active contributors have 
> voted in the release naming process each given cycle?
Not necessarily in %, but the total number of votes cast is reported 
with each set of election results.

--------------

The Fedora 17 release name is: Beefy Miracle

Voting period:  Tuesday 2011-11-04 00:00:00 UTC to Monday 2011-10-10
23:59:59 UTC
Number of valid ballots cast:  292
------------

The Fedora 16 release name is: Verne

Voting period:  Tuesday 2011-04-05 00:00:00 to Monday 2011-04-11 23:59:59
Number of valid ballots cast:  421

------------

The Fedora 15 release name is: Lovelock

Voting period:  Tuesday 2010-10-26 00:00:00 to Monday 2010-11-01 23:59:59
Number of valid ballots cast:  296

-----------

The Fedora 14 release name is:

    Laughlin

Following are the full election results.

* * *

Voting period:  Tue 2010-05-04 00:00:01 - Mon 2010-05-10 00:00:01
Number of valid ballots cast:  206

-----------

......13 (Goddard) had 313 ballots, 12 (Constantine) had 393 ballots, 11 (Leonidas) had 310, 10 (Cambridge) had 390 ballots.

Interestingly, the results for F10 actually included the number of users eligible to vote, in addition to the number of valid ballots that were cast. I didn't see anything since then in any of the announcements that reflected the eligible voter number.

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2008-July/000249.html


-robyn




>
> JBG
> _______________________________________________
> advisory-board mailing list
> advisory-board at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board