<br><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>I hear this argument a lot. The fact is that Fedora is the 'upstream'<br>
for many projects. We're often the first distro to pick up a new<br>technology and integrate it. Just because RHEL is one distro that<br>gets it after us shouldn't be counted against Fedora.</blockquote><div><br>
Fedora is the upstream of many projects. Some of which are considered productions systems, RHEL and OLPC, and probably others. I am guessing that these projects all maintian there own patches, and may indeed have a longer support life the Fedora. Doesn't it make sense for some of the maintainence work to be done in the upstream. I will shut up about this now though, sorry to stir the pot.
<br></div><br></div><br>