<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:34 AM, seth vidal <span dir="ltr"></span>wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 02:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> FWIW, one vendor doesn't "own" all the infrastructure. We're<br>
> a pretty<br>
> diverse group as far as infrastructure goes with several<br>
> sponsors. It's<br>
> something we've been working on for some time.<br>
><br>
> Yes and that is a very good thing. Thanks for that.<br>
<br>
</div>whois <a href="http://fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<br>
one org controls the domain. If things are ugly the domain's nameservers<br>
are updated and control is changed.<br>
<br>
That's the ballgame.<br></blockquote><div><br>----<br><br>Yes, that cannot be changed without a switch to being a non-profit foundation but if the same organization controls all the servers, shutting them all down is much more easier. <br>
</div></div>