<p>First, I apologize for top posting, however my phone is ignorant of netiquette. We explored doing something similar with FAmSCo's trac and private tickets appears to be an instance wide boolean at least with the version of trac in fedorahosted. So the tool appears to be the limiting factor as you can't have public tickets with the private tickets plugin enabled. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 10, 2011 6:13 PM, "Tom Callaway" <<a href="mailto:tcallawa@redhat.com">tcallawa@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> On 01/10/2011 06:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:<br>
>> On 01/10/2011 04:06 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:<br>>> <br>>>> Here is my proposal how to make communication with the board more<br>>>> efficient:<br>>>><br>>>> 1. The board opens it's trac instance at<br>
>>> <a href="https://fedorahosted.org/board/">https://fedorahosted.org/board/</a><br>>> <br>>> The board will continue to require some form of private instance/method<br>>> for sensitive matters, but I'm sure we're all for improving transparency<br>
>> all around. If making a public trac instance is a good way to do that,<br>>> so be it.<br>> <br>> This is probably feasible, assuming we have a way to mark tickets as<br>> private. (and we don't open the old tickets)<br>
> <br>> ~tom<br>> <br>> ==<br>> Fedora Project<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> advisory-board mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org">advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board</a><br></div>