<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN'>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv='Content-Type' content='text/html;charset=us-ascii'>
<style>BODY{font:10pt Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif;}</style>
</head>
<body>
<br><blockquote style="padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); margin-right: 0px;"><hr><b>From:</b> Jared K. Smith [mailto:jsmith@fedoraproject.org]<br><b>To:</b> Fedora community advisory board [mailto:advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org]<br><b>Sent:</b> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:18:05 +0000<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: Remaining issues for the multi desktop DVD<br><br>On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:43 PM, David Riches <<a href="mailto:david.r@ultracar.co.uk">david.r@ultracar.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
> afaik, isolinux can do the same job that grub is currently doing, because<br>
> its not attempting to chainload the isos. I'm happy to test it tomorrow<br>
> though.<br>
<br>
Please try that -- I think that would make several of us more<br>
comfortable, both from a "failure to boot" and an "easier to make look<br>
good" perspective.<br>
</blockquote>Seems to work fine, I haven't gone through the liveinst procedure, but realistically these are booting in exactly the same way as a conventional live image, just with a subtle change to the boot argument (notably live_dir=foo)<br><br>http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot-1.png<br><br>Regards<br><br>Dave<br><blockquote style="padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); margin-right: 0px;"><span></span><br>
--<br>
Jared Smith<br>
Fedora Project Leader<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
advisory-board mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org">advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board</a><br>
</blockquote><style>
</style>
</body></html>