<p><br>
On Jan 16, 2012 5:19 AM, "Jaroslav Reznik" <<a href="mailto:jreznik@redhat.com">jreznik@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi guys,<br>
> sorry I missed the call/IRC :(<br>
><br>
> ----- Original Message -----<br>
> > In attendance at FUDcon: Toshio Kuratomi, Christoph Wickert, Jon<br>
> > Stanley, Jared Smith, Peter Robinson, David Nalley<br>
> > In attendance via phone/IRC: Rex Dieter<br>
> > Not in attendance: Jaroslav Reznik, Rudi Landmann, Guillermo Gómez<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > == SOPA ==<br>
> ><br>
> > Proposals:<br>
> ><br>
> > 1. Change the front page with clickthrough with general position on<br>
> > Jan 18th. 2 for - 5 against.<br>
> > 2. General statement to announce + ticker tape linking to statements<br>
> > til the end of the month on the front page. +7<br>
> > 3. Do Nothing - obviated<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Proposal 2 approved.<br>
><br>
> Ok, agreed.<br>
><br>
> > Jared to write statement to announce and arrange for ticker tape.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > ==French Community Domain==<br>
> ><br>
> > they want to have fr. <a href="http://fedoracommunity.org">fedoracommunity.org</a> pointing to <a href="http://fedora-fr.org">fedora-fr.org</a><br>
> ><br>
> > approved, no dissension<br>
><br>
> Agreed.<br>
><br>
> > == DuckDuckGo proposals: ==<br>
> ><br>
> > 1 - ship search engine plugin<br>
> > 2 - default for the above<br>
> > 3 - use ddg for start.fp.o as well.<br>
> ><br>
> > Proposal: 1-2 is a maintainer issue - please file in bugzilla. 3 is a<br>
> > websites issue - file on their trac.<br>
> > The board itself has no opinion on the matter<br>
> ><br>
> > approved - no dissension<br>
><br>
> Does this mean Board approved it to be take into effect as a policy or<br>
> it's more "file bug and if maintainer feels it's ok, do it?".</p>
<p>It means the board has no preference on which search engine and it's up to the individual packages to add new search options and which one they set as default on a case by case basis.</p>
<p>> I like the idea of open source friendly search engine but I see a a few<br>
> issues with it - see my comments to Mairin's post.<br>
><br>
> > == Fedora Council Discussion ==<br>
> > non-elected group with membership from all projects within Fedora to<br>
> > improve collaboration. Christoph asked for feedback<br>
><br>
> Christoph, could you share your proposal. For me it sounds like some black<br>
> magic for now :)<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > == Finance discussion ==<br>
> ><br>
> > Lots of status updates on community credit cards, and how we move<br>
> > forward. No decision.<br>
> > Proposals to come out of this discussion.<br>
> ><br>
> > End of meeting.<br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > advisory-board mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org">advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> > <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> advisory-board mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org">advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board</a></p>