<p dir="ltr">+1</p>
<p dir="ltr">On Dec 10, 2013 3:23 AM, "Jaroslav Reznik" <<a href="mailto:jreznik@redhat.com">jreznik@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> ----- Original Message -----<br>
> > Hi board,<br>
> ><br>
> > according to the schedule [1] the election wrangler should have been<br>
> > picked a month ago. So far this hasn't happened, this is why I throw my<br>
> > hat into the ring.<br>
><br>
> Hi Christoph,<br>
> I'm more than happy to see a volunteer - with inode and Ankur, we were<br>
> thinking who could step into.<br>
><br>
> Elections schedule in the main schedule is not relevant, Ankur did his<br>
> own schedule (to make it easier for him) and it is PITA to sync it. It's<br>
> removed from future schedules (but not F20 one).<br>
><br>
> And where should elections aim? The agreement with FESCo is, that<br>
> elections will be held in the end of January, to be coordinated with<br>
> the multi product deadline. So old FESCo is going to be in charge by<br>
> this time (for continuity). Looking on the current list of blockers,<br>
> we're even not going to do anything exceptional to that 30 days after<br>
> release rule as there's possibility of F20 slip to January.<br>
><br>
> > Please confirm you are fine with me going ahead.<br>
><br>
> Go ahead, we will be in touch for scheduling questions but this time<br>
> you have pretty free hands to do whatever you want :).<br>
><br>
> Jaroslav<br>
><br>
> > Best regards,<br>
> > Christoph<br>
> ><br>
> > [1] <a href="http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-elections.html">http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-elections.html</a><br>
</p>