<div dir="ltr">Hi<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Josh Boyer<span dir="ltr"></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:<br>
> Hi<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Put another way, if we're going to make concessions and tell people<br>
>> how to get said software in our documentation, why would we not make<br>
>> those same concessions, with the same messaging, in our software where<br>
>> legally possible?<br>
><br>
><br>
> I understand it but a couple of wiki pages don't serve that case very well.<br>
> I could setup a redirect now in a couple of minutes and the argument is<br>
<br>
</div>It's not lost. It's moved ;)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>II highly doubt, anyone would point out say fedora users list or Ask Fedora answers and say, hey, we are answering questions on Nvidia driver here, so lets provide a better method for users to find the Nvidia driver in GNOME Software. Well, I guess you could but your argument would be pretty weak.<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
</div>They aren't random. They were vetted and approved by Fedora Legal as<br>
being pages that can reference third party repositories. They are, to<br>
my knowledge, the only such pages approved in a legal sense. If they<br>
were random, I would have deleted them or had them deleted as I did<br>
the other pages that were found that weren't approved.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't think the Flash page had anything to do with legal approval and to my knowledge, there is nothing preventing a similar wiki page from describing say Skype. It is non-free software but there is no legal issue with describing how to install non-free software. I don't see why one would need legal approval for that. Something in the wiki doesn't make it endorsed by Fedora as a project. They are often user contributed content (for example, FWN summaries describing how to install the Nvidia driver or even MP3 codecs in great detail) . <br>
</div><div><br></div><div>Rahul <br></div></div></div></div></div>