<div dir="ltr">Hi<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Robyn Bergeron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rbergero@redhat.com" target="_blank">rbergero@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
2a) Do Fedora's foundations allow for any ease of use around non-free<br>
software?<br>
<br>
We seem to have several people that think they don't, yet we have wiki<br>
pages explicitly describing how to install non-free software (<br>
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash</a>). We also have a page that points to<br>
3rd party repositories that contain a wide variety of software of both<br>
free and non-free nature (<br>
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Third_party_repositories" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Third_party_repositories</a>), which has been<br>
approved yet seems at odds.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>IMO, this is a deflection and fails to recognize the difference of describing something in the wiki vs providing the software much more directly. If a couple of pages in the wiki is being brought up some kind of major counter point, I will be happy to redirect the wiki pages to dozens of questions and answers that are similarly asked and answered regularly in Ask Fedora. Ask Fedora is a user community forum and hence I suppose have less of an endorsement value compared to the wiki but would serve the same purpose as informing the users without having this side discussion occupy the board time.<br>
<br></div><div>Rahul <br></div></div></div></div>