[Ambassadors] Active or Inactive
Digvijay Patankar
dbpatankar at gmail.com
Thu Feb 26 02:51:08 UTC 2009
Yes, I too am support Li, Songlin. Why we need to discuss this and waste
our time?
Better talk on something else.
There is no point on talking on "active" or "inactive".
Li, Songlin wrote:
> It's boring arguing about "active" and "inactive".
> I am wondering why we want to talk about this.
>
> 2009/2/26 Hernan Pachas <hernan.pachas at gmail.com>
>
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> In my opinion, anyone who cares to read, think about, or respond to
>>>> this ongoing thread is considered active :)
>>>>
>>> OK, I was holding back so as not to add to the noise, but if I'm
>>> required to do so.. ;-)
>>> --
>>> Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
>>> Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
>>> Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
>>> Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
>>> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>
More information about the ambassadors
mailing list