[Ambassadors] What's really needed to be an Ambassador?

[María Leandro]

John, I think you have a great point there.

If the times where we won't need rules comes, that would be fantastic; but
the truth is that there is a lot of contributors that join the Ambassador
program to feel that they can help the comunity. I think that they should
join the Ambassadors project by meritocracy.

So another question comes to my mind.

1.- A contributor needs to be an Ambassadors to "get permission" to help the
community and do events? (this is a question that at least 60% of the
applicants I get ask for)
2.- A contributor should help some other team to get that meritocracy to be
an ambassador?

So, for example. Should we explain better to the applicants that they don't
"need" to be Ambassadors to be able to help their communities and groups?

Taking the John idea would be a crazy suggestion and maybe I'm wrong, but we
should encourage more the contributors section and make the people
learn/do/teach something instead promote the Ambassadors group. For me, an
Ambassadors is the same than a Marketing Team contributor :S




-- 
tatica
Maria Gracia Leandro
http://www.tatica.org
http://www.fedora-ve.org
http://proyectofedora.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro
LinuxUser= 440285
GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56
"Be yourself... Don't be anyone else"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ambassadors/attachments/20101214/6743c36d/attachment.html>