[Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups

[Joerg Simon]

On 27.10.2013 10:32, Nobrakal wrote:
> Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
> case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
> any representant of the ambassador group.
> I exaggerate, because some developers are ambassadors (like C.
> Wickert, H. Guémar...), but they are in these groups primary for their
> skills in programming. I don't say "they are bad ambassadors", but I
> think developper task + ambassador reprensentant task are too much for
> one person. 

till this point i do not understand the intention of the e-mail

> I think it's a great idea to strengthens the links between ambassadors
> and WG. The ambassador is an important link between users and
> developpers, on my mind, he must be in these groups.

"must" is a strong word - we discussed concepts to enforce additional
group-memberships for Ambassadors as requirement in the past without
final results. Is this what you intent?

-- 
Joerg (kital) Simon
jsimon at fedoraproject.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon
http://kitall.blogspot.com
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ambassadors/attachments/20131027/a9acc85a/attachment.sig>