Hello, all --<br><br>I was unable to attend the second FAmSCo town hall -- to be honest, it was at 2 a.m. my time and I fell asleep before it started -- and while I don't have any specific disagreements with any of the other candidates' statements, I do have a significant problem with this one:<br>
<br><pre><span class="tm">11:25:08</span><span class="nk"> <kaio></span> 2. I would rephrase that into "Upgrade the ambassadors to superambassadors." - multi-functional ambassadors<br>who specialize also in something they prefer: Development, Design, Documentation, Infrastructure, Testing, Marketing,<br>
Release, etc. I expect superambassadors are keen to share their knowledge and experiences via presentations and<br>discussions in meet-ups.<br></pre>I am not sure what this suggestion means. Does it mean making a higher "level" of ambassador membership? Taking this back to front, don't ambassadors already "share their knowledge and experience via presentations and discussions in meet-ups"? My understanding is that many Ambassadors wear several hats in the Fedora Project (no pun intended -- no, really) -- and while we all contribute to the Ambassador program at our own level, it's expected thatt $AMBASSADOR_A who knows x, y, z is already imparting that knowledge at presentations, etc., s/he is doing.<br>
<br>In other words, the multifunction aspect here is already in place and should be a part of an individual Ambassador's toolkit when s/he advocates for FOSS in general and Fedora in particular.<br><br>Again, if this is a suggestion to make a different, possibly higher, tier of ambassador, I am completely against it.<br>
<br>We are already trying to dispel a myth that the mentors in FAmSCo hold some sort of special "rank and privilege" within the organizational structure of FAmSCo. The last thing we need is to add fuel to this inequality "fire" by adding ranks where none should exist.<br>
<br>Larry Cafiero<br>