[fedora-arm] uImage-2.6.30-sheevaplug is definitely broken

Dan Horák dan at danny.cz
Sun Jan 9 16:54:24 UTC 2011


Chris Tyler píše v So 08. 01. 2011 v 12:48 -0500: 
> On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 18:36 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Chris Tyler píše v So 08. 01. 2011 v 12:20 -0500: 
> > > On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 12:28 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > Just a note to say that I'm having the precise same problem described
> > > > here:
> > > > 
> > > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2010-December/thread.html#786
> > > > 
> > > > 'Mojibake' after the kernel is uncompressed.  No tty settings seem to
> > > > fix it[*].
> > > > 
> > > > The wiki links to the uImage-2.6.30-sheevaplug image all over, but it
> > > > is definitely broken either inherently or just with the latest
> > > > SheevaPlug hardware.
> > > 
> > > We should probably update these wiki links to point to a common 'ARM
> > > Kernel' page, which we can then use as a trampoline to a
> > > currently-recommended kernel or a collection of kernels, and later
> > > change to point to an RPM-based kernel solution. Any takers for this bit
> > > of wiki gardening?
> > > 
> > > (Speaking of kernels, I'm going to get a couple students looking at
> > > doing RPM-based kernels for ARM this semester. Some things from primary
> > > archs won't apply, e.g., updating grub boot menus -- I think ARM with
> > > uBoot will probably need some ugly pieces like a hard link to the
> > > "current" kernel, at least to start. We also need to do an inventory to
> > > figure out the smallest number of kernels necessary to support common
> > > hardware).
> > 
> > We have a student in Red Hat Brno who will work on RPM-based kernels as
> > his bachelor thesis and it should include an improvement in grubby to
> > use the flash-kernel utility
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548422) Debian is
> > developing and using to actually flash the kernel to a supported range
> > of devices. We think the kernel installation workflow could be very
> > similar to the one used on x86.
> 
> Cool! Any forward movement on that one? The review is a year old.

Peter told me he still has some duties in school for the next 1 or 2
weeks and then he will join us here again.


Dan




More information about the arm mailing list