[fedora-arm] ARMv5 and atomic operations
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Tue Apr 24 11:39:44 UTC 2012
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 09:31 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/23/2012 06:36 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> >>> I'm running the Ubuntun 2.6.38 Tegra2 kernel (because of their fbdev
> >>> support) on top of Fedora 17 armv5el on an Toshiba AC100 Laptop. The
> >>> rsyslog package crashed everytime because of the missing kernel support
> >>> of cmpxchg64. So when relying on the kernel helpers make sure that the
> >>> resp. kernel support exists.
> >>
> >> Indeed. I had to write a workaround in IcedTea (i.e. java) on ARM for
> >> just this reason. If you can't depend on a kernel helper being there I
> >> can't see it's of any use.
> >
> > Kernel helpers don't disappear with time. You therefore can probe for
> > their availability (see the documentation) in case the kernel support
> > could be backported, or just refuse to run if the kernel version isn't
> > recent enough. This is not much different from relying on a new
> > syscall.
>
> Indeed it is. What would I gain from adding such a test? All I can
> see is extra complication, untested code paths, and larger programs.
What alternative do you have, other than not using any atomic
operations?
> The untested code path is particularly nasty.
How buggy the following code might be:
fprintf(stderr, "Your kernel is too old, aborting\n")
exit(1);
?
Nicolas
More information about the arm
mailing list