[fedora-arm] heavybuilders

Brendan Conoboy blc at redhat.com
Mon Feb 27 22:36:41 UTC 2012


On 02/27/2012 02:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[snip]
> I wanted to get others thoughs before i went and made the change

Just to be clear, these two systems are the same machines:
hsv-trimslice-9-v5tel        N   N    0.0/2.0 arm              -
hsv-trimslice-9-v7hl         Y   N    2.0/2.0 armhfp 
2012-02-27 22:04:45

We just provision them as v5 or v7 according to what it looks like is 
needed.  That's the idea anyway- we aren't doing enough builds at once 
that we've had to balance anything.

FYI, the HSV pandas also have dedicated sata disks on them and are 
roughly the performance equivalent of the trimslices because of it.  The 
actual tally of heavybuilders (defined as having dedicated usb-sata 
storage) is:

hsv-panda-1-v5tel
hsv-panda-2-v5tel
hsv-panda-3-v5tel
hsv-panda-5-v5tel
hsv-panda-6-v5tel
hsv-panda-8-v5tel
cdot-trimslice-13-1
cdot-trimslice-14-1-v7hl
hsv-trimslice-10-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-9-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-8-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-7-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-6-{v5tel,v7hl}

We can make all the HSV trimslices into v7 builders and that will give 
us a 6/6 split, which seems reasonable.

-- 
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc at redhat.com


More information about the arm mailing list