<p>On 5 Aug 2011 19:15, "Gordan Bobic" <<a href="mailto:gordan@bobich.net">gordan@bobich.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> How does one pick the correct "ports" part of glibc for the correct core?<br>
><br>
> I tried to build the RHEL6 glibc with the F13 ports tar ball, but the<br>
> build eventually fails:<br>
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi/4.4.5/libgcc_eh.a(unwind-arm.o):<br>
> In function `__gnu_Unwind_Backtrace':<br>
> (.text+0x8b8): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_guard'<br>
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status</p>
<p>Looks very much like the error in <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726495">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726495</a></p>
<p>HTH,<br>
Niels</p>
<p>> I'm guessing this is to do with the mismatch between<br>
> glibc-ports-2.12-26-gcf64098.tar.xz from the F13 package<br>
> and<br>
> glibc-2.12-2-gc4ccff1-fedora.tar.bz2<br>
> glibc-2.12-2-gc4ccff1.tar.bz2<br>
> from the RHEL6 package.<br>
><br>
> Where do I get glibc-ports-2.12-2 ?<br>
> And what do the 8 characters at the end signify?<br>
><br>
> Gordan<br>
><br>
> On 08/05/2011 01:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Gordan Bobic <<a href="mailto:gordan@bobich.net">gordan@bobich.net</a><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:gordan@bobich.net">gordan@bobich.net</a>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:42:19 +0100, Peter Robinson<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:pbrobinson@gmail.com">pbrobinson@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:pbrobinson@gmail.com">pbrobinson@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:<br>
> > > Hi,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Are the patches for F13 glibc to make it work on ARM available<br>
> > > somewhere? I noticed that F13-ARM ships with 2.12-4, but primary<br>
> > > F13<br>
> > > ships with 2.12-1 which was updated to 2.12.2-1. Where are the<br>
> > > patches<br>
> > > from 2.12-1 to 2.12-4 for ARM? I found this page:<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Packages_needing_patching">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Packages_needing_patching</a><br>
> > > [2]<br>
> > > but it only lists F12 packages, the F13 section is empty.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > The reason I'm asking is because I'm building RHEL6 for ARM, and<br>
> > > glibc<br>
> > > is one off the packages that don't build. Build fails with armv5tel<br>
> > > not<br>
> > > supported. I can see in the F13 spec file that the only arm<br>
> > > specific<br>
> > > patch applied is tzupdate2.patch, with a couple of ARM specific<br>
> > > compile<br>
> > > options and suchlike, I just wanted to make sure there is nothing<br>
> > > else<br>
> > > I'm missing.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > In the srpm?<br>
> ><br>
> > Yes, as I said, I saw the spec file in the srpm, and the only thing I<br>
> > can see there is the tzupdate2.patch, but that doesn't explain the gap<br>
> > between 2.12-1 and 2.12-4. My concern is that there may be ARM<br>
> > specific<br>
> > fixes between those versions, and primary F13 never appears to have<br>
> > shipped with 2.12-4.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > It is basically just that, possibly some changes to the spec file itself<br>
> > as well from memory when I looked at it. diffing against mainline will<br>
> > tell you that. The fixes for F-13 weren't accepted upstream, the ones<br>
> > for F-14 were less bad but I think F-15 will have something that's<br>
> > acceptable to upstream.<br>
> ><br>
> > Peter<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> arm mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:arm@lists.fedoraproject.org">arm@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm</a><br>
</p>