<div dir="ltr"><div>Could this be due to an outdated version of u-boot? I haven't had a chance to get Fedora on my BBB yet, so I don't know what version of u-boot is used/recommended in the image but I recall hearing about this in the OpenBSD mailing list:<br>
</div><div><br></div><div><div>"The last version of u-boot includes some important changes for the users</div><div>of BBB. With this version, the BBB runs at 1Ghz (now is running at</div><div>550mhz) when the board is connected to the power connector. The code was</div>
<div>developed by various developers of TI, so it's safe."</div></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-arm&m=138100865002079&w=2">http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-arm&m=138100865002079&w=2</a><br>
</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jos Vos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jos@xos.nl" target="_blank">jos@xos.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 06:46:00PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:<br>
<br>
> Are you using the same SD card for both?<br>
<br>
</div>Same brand, same speed and class specification, only one is 4 GB and<br>
the other 8 GB. But when I run it multiple times (all results are<br>
approx. the same) I guess Python etc. is in the buffer cache.<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
--<br>
-- Jos Vos <<a href="mailto:jos@xos.nl">jos@xos.nl</a>><br>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364<br>
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
arm mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:arm@lists.fedoraproject.org">arm@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>