Fw: Mock, autosigning

[Clark Williams]

Second send, since I managed to use the old buildsys list address in my
previous forward of this message. Sigh...

I've forwarded Julian's proposed plugin for mock to perform signing
since he wasn't sure where best to send it. I have *not* reviewed this
patch yet but will be doing so in the near future. Help reviewing from
anyone with signing expertise in the Fedora infrastructure would be
appreciated. 

Clark

Begin forwarded message:

Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:30:03 +0000
From: Julien Ballet <lta at fb.com>
To: "clark.williams at gmail.com" <clark.williams at gmail.com>
Subject: Mock, autosigning


Hi,

I’ve been wandering around the different mock pages (wiki/trac), and I
haven’t found any indications about the preferred way to submit patches
for mock. The wiki page tells to go to Trac, and trac doesn’t say
anything :) So please forgive me for looking at git logs and reaching
out to the most recent/active contributor :)

I’ve been working on a small patch  to mock that adds automatic signing
of built package. It also introduces a small api change, so please let
me know if it’s wrong and if you have a better idea :) Let me also know
if there’s a better place to post patches :)

Regards,
Lta.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/attachments/20150216/6a6dc03b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sign-plugin.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6147 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/attachments/20150216/6a6dc03b/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/attachments/20150216/6a6dc03b/attachment.sig>