openstack in EPEL status

[Pádraig Brady]

On 11/17/2011 09:50 PM, Steve Traylen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were
>> recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.).  You can
>> ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number
>> policies as well.  Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they
>> change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all
>> compatible.  Other times they stick with the minor number since they've
>> gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development.
> 
> Hi,
> I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8.

Excellent thanks. I'll try this out tomorrow.
You did name the package correctly as "webob" rather than
"webobj" as you typoed above :)
One thing I would adjust is s/10/1.0/

About using v1.1.1, I think it's better to align
with what's used in Fedora, rather moving ahead to the
lastest and "greatest". This will be a relatively
short lived package in any case, as we'll probably
be updating the package proper in RHEL 6.3

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848

> I don't seem to be able to edit the wiki page.

I've just updated the wiki there:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenStack#OpenStack_in_EPEL

You should be able to also, if you have a fedora account.
One thing I noticed is that you need to shift-refresh
on a wiki page after login, for editing links to be apparent.

cheers,
Pádraig.