openstack in EPEL status

[Pádraig Brady]

On 11/17/2011 09:50 PM, Steve Traylen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were
>> recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.).  You can
>> ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number
>> policies as well.  Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they
>> change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all
>> compatible.  Other times they stick with the minor number since they've
>> gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development.
> 
> Hi,
> I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848

I'm reviewing the above.

I've posted python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-2 here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755065
Review swap?

I've built local glance and nova packages against
the above 2 compat packages and initial tests are passing.
I'm commit the openstack updates soon.

cheers,
Pádraig.