Openstack in HTTPD URL Scheme
ayoung at redhat.com
Fri Apr 27 23:46:48 UTC 2012
On 04/27/2012 06:21 PM, Matt_Domsch at Dell.com wrote:
> NameVirtualHost localhost?
We can use Virtual hosts to distinguish but that implies either
separate ports or DNS support. I'd like to stay away from multiple
ports due to the SELinux port assignments clashing with the ones the
OPenstack tends to use, but named virtual hosts will work fine.
> -----Original Message-----
> *From: *Adam Young [ayoung at redhat.com <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>]
> *Sent: *Friday, April 27, 2012 04:36 PM Central Standard Time
> *To: *cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> *Subject: *Re: Openstack in HTTPD URL Scheme
> On 04/27/2012 05:33 PM, Christian Berendt wrote:
> > Hello Adam.
> > On 04/27/2012 11:25 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> >> #should this be keystone or identity?
> > I would prefer using always the development name of the project, in
> > this case keystone.
> > Regards, Christian.
> Thanks, Christian. I suspect that will work better with documentation
> as well.
> Pete Zaitcev also has pointed out that Swift probably won't play nicely
> with this, as the URL scheme is pretty much driven by Amazon, and it
> assumes a top level URL along the lines of
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cloud