keystone config file defaults

[Adam Young]

I'd say, no.  We should not be setting a default at all.  Ther is a 
readically different approach between Fedora and Debian regarding thee 
state that an application is in post Package install.  The Debian 
approach will make you go through  the configuration,  and leave you 
with a working application.  THe Fedora approach assumes that you are 
doing an unattended  install and upgrade,  and that you will configure 
the application afterwards.

Our sample configuration file should instead be commented to show the 
user what they need to set in order to get the various back ends 
working.  But assuming MySQL,  SQLITE,  or LDAP,  will be wrong for some 
subset of users.


On 02/22/2012 12:30 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Alan Pevec"<apevec at gmail.com>
>> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"<cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:14:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: keystone config file defaults
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Dan Prince<dprince at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Reverse that diff!
>>>
>>> 26c27
>>> <  driver = keystone.identity.backends.kvs.Identity
>>> ---
>>>> driver = keystone.identity.backends.sql.Identity
>> yeah, I do that
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=openstack-keystone.git;a=commitdiff;h=074d4a0762a33d2b020920be3650849cf2f69ea0
> Ah. Thanks Alan. I must have pulled it just before that change went in this morning.
>
> Cheers.
>
>> Next on my list is to switch to mysql, same like openstack-nova RPM.
> Sounds good.
>
>> Alan
>> _______________________________________________
>> cloud mailing list
>> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud