Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs

[Sam Kottler]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robyn Bergeron" <rbergero at redhat.com>
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 3:09:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sam Kottler" <skottler at redhat.com>
> > To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 3:02:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tim Flink" <tflink at redhat.com>
> > > To: cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:46:22 PM
> > > Subject: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
> > > 
> > > We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting
> > > (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no
> > > posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
> > > 
> > > If you have been testing the AMIs, please report your results. If you
> > > haven't been testing them but are interested in doing so - please do.
> > > Show stoppers for the AMIs are likely to be release blocking and the
> > > sooner that those issues are discovered, the less likely that we'll
> > > slip the F19 final release.
> > 
> > In my opinion there should be an account for people to use to test the
> > images. Access could be granted via IAM and resources could be limited that
> > way.
> 
> Why go that route vs. simply publishing the images for anyone to test?
> 
> The advantage I see to what you're saying is that people don't have to
> basically spend their own money to test images - but by the same token I
> don't think we want to limit it only to that group.

Right, I think it'd be cool for us to cover the cost of testing our images. Even if each person just got to create a m1.small or another type of small (cheap) instance, it'd be great not to ask people to test beta software on their own dime.

> 
> I've set up stuff on the community-cloud account for usage with IAM before -
> it's been a while but I seem to recall it was slightly tedious but
> reasonable enough for one-off events (having test accounts for an event, for
> example) - but if we started doling out access with every TC/RC I'd probably
> want to figure out how to get that scripted into being part of releng
> processes. I could probably write it but at some point I have to imagine
> that what would take me a week would probably take someone else very very
> little time :)
> 
> Thoughts? Garrett - since you're the one who helped me with the IAM stuff and
> wrote the wiki instructions and whatnot - do you think that could somehow be
> tied into FAS groups or something?

FAS integration would be excellent. I can do some research about external auth options they have if someone else doesn't beat me to it.

> 
> -r
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > To report results or to find test cases, please visit:
> > > 
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
> > > 
> > > This will redirect to the most recent spin (TC5 at the time of this
> > > email).
> > > 
> > > The relevant test cases are:
> > >  - QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation
> > >  - QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
> > > 
> > > There are links to the specific test cases from the test matrices and
> > > result reporting is just editing the wiki page (there are example
> > > result formats on the page as well).
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Tim
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cloud mailing list
> > > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>