<p>That's perfect. I did some packaging work on eucalyptus few month ago and went the same way.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Feb 2, 2010 6:37 PM, "Matthew Miller" <<a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org">mattdm@mattdm.org</a>> wrote:<br><br>Question One:<br>
<br>
How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to<br>
change them to more descriptive names:<br>
<br>
<br>
eucalyptus-sc -> eucalyptus-storage-controller<br>
eucalyptus-cloud -> eucalyptus-cloud-controller<br>
eucalyptus-cc -> eucalyptus-cluster-controller<br>
eucalyptus-nc -> eucalyptus-node-controller<br>
eucalyptus-gl -> eucalyptus-gatherlog<br>
<br>
Does anyone have strong opinions on this?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Matthew Miller <<a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org">mattdm@mattdm.org</a>><br>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services<br>
Computing & Information Technology<br>
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cloud mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org">cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud</a><br>
</font></blockquote></p>