<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Matthew Miller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org" target="_blank">mattdm@mattdm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:22:53PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:<br>
> On Monday, July 01, 2013 12:09:08 PM Matthew Miller wrote:<br>
> > Is this useful in the cloud image? It pulls in some stuff like slang and<br>
> > newt. Is it useful to have in the base, or is it something people might add<br>
> > if needed?<br>
> If you need to adjust SSO (Single Sign On) capabilities wouldn't you want<br>
> this on so you can use it for scripting, say using Samba/Active Directory<br>
> for login management?<br>
<br>
</div>Yeah, but you'll have to add a bunch of other packages for that, too, right?<br>
Does it help for authconfig to be there if samba isn't?<br><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div>Figure it depends on what our cloud image is trying to achieve. Does it try to leverage any of the cloud use cases where SSO is usual / necessary? Personally, I very much doubt it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>And as Adam said, authconfig usually doesn't do anything useful unless you add a few other packages, too.</div><div><br></div><div>-- Sandro </div></div><br></div></div>