<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 16 April 2015 at 05:54, Matthew Miller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mattdm@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">mattdm@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">In addition to 5tFTW, I've been occassionally posting things like<br>
<<a href="http://fedoramagazine.org/lets-talk-about-fedora-project-objectives/" target="_blank">http://fedoramagazine.org/lets-talk-about-fedora-project-objectives/</a>><br>
to Fedora Magazine.<br>
<br>
However, the general consensus in Fedora Marketing (of which the<br>
magazine is a branch) is that content there should be on the vast<br>
majority _user_ focused, rather than inward/contributor focused.<br>
<br>
I could set up a personal blog (and aggregate it to the planet), but<br>
I've never been a prolific blogger and signs are not pointing to me<br>
becoming one -- I'll probably continue to do a post or two a month (in<br>
addition to 5tFTW, which I think will stay on the Magazine). I was also<br>
talking to Remy, and he was wondering where a good place for _his_<br>
Fedora leadership posts would be.<br>
<br>
So, I'm thinking of maybe asking infrastructure to set up a wordpress<br>
site specifically for council members. What do you think? Council<br>
members, would you post to it?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi guys. </div><div><br></div><div>I am speaking as myself and not infrastructure. </div><div><br></div><div>Infrastructure had this in place once before. It was a logistics nightmare and none of the parties involved were happy with the service , plugins available, security updates, spam filtering, and themes. </div><div><br></div><div>After a short while, it was determined that anything wordpress related was better run at an opensource friendly company which specialized in blogging software versus running it ourselves. If a blog setup is required, I would think that looking towards <a href="http://wordpress.com">wordpress.com</a> or similar would be a better long term solution.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div></div>
</div></div>