[Design-team] Fedora GRUB2 boot menu, from design perspective

Martin Sourada martin.sourada at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 21:52:23 UTC 2012


Hi Elad,

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:07:59 +0300 
Elad Alfassa wrote:

> refer to this thread in -devel:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168712.html
> 
> As I understand, by design, we wanted the older kernels to appear in
> the "Advanced options" menu, but right now, it breaks every time you
> run a kernel update.
> Also, the string Fedora Linux is kinda wrong, cause the OS is called
> Fedora.
> It should be something like Fedora (with Linux *kernel version here*).
> 
> What is the stand of the design team on this?
> 

first of all, I do *not* speak for the design team, just stating my
opinion.

The intended design is probably best what we can have but,
 * Given the fedora target audience, it's not uncommon to have multiple
   fedoras installed, so it would be good if the items looked like
   Fedora $REL_VER$ $REL_NAME$ (or without the release name).
 * All kernels should be in subdirectory. That the current kernel
   updates break the intended setup (as set-up in /etc) is obviously
   incorrect and should be fixed. Both ways (submenus or direct menu)
   are better than current state of things.
 * I do not seem to see any theme, even though there's obviously the
   beefy-miracle one installed. It's probably missing in configs
   (/etc/grub.d/) though -- my issue, or a general one?

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/design-team/attachments/20120618/86f2d3ad/attachment.sig>


More information about the design-team mailing list