<div dir="ltr">there is a problem in blender 2.72b<div>Hash: Unknown</div><div>Branch: Unknown<br><div><br></div><div><img src="cid:ii_i41rl02n0_14a78fa531be566f" width="562" height="450"><br><img src="cid:ii_i41rl02x1_14a78fa531be566f" width="562" height="450"><br><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Matthew Miller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mattdm@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">mattdm@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 04:05:55PM -0500, Ryan Lerch wrote:<br>
> My thought is that we ship:<br>
> * the current default Fedora wallpaper and lock screen (of course :) )<br>
> * the default GNOME wallpaper<br>
> * a set of (maybe 10-15) of the best supplemental wallpapers from<br>
> all the previous Fedora supplemental wallpapers.<br>
<br>
</span>Currently, we avoid Fedora branding on the wallpaper itself in order to<br>
keep trademark-restricted packages to one place. I wonder if it would<br>
be too much of a burden to the maintainer of that package to add a<br>
subpackage with wallpapers which _do_ use Fedora trademarks?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Matthew Miller<br>
<<a href="mailto:mattdm@fedoraproject.org">mattdm@fedoraproject.org</a>><br>
Fedora Project Leader<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
design-team mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org">design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team" target="_blank">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>