jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Aug 16 18:17:30 UTC 2007
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:10:35 -0400
Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not against it. The complaint will be that people will just get
> failures and not have anything to show them why. Maybe we can get the
> quick change into the default firewall rules so that they'll log
> failures so that it's not at least entirely silent
+10, that's the most annoying thing to me about our default rules.
It's so silent. If we're afraid of it drowning out /var/log/messages
we could send it to a firewall log file. But I'm all for dropping
these from Firstboot and going with our defaults.
Anybody for firewall2allow? (:
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20070816/899f16f0/attachment.bin
More information about the desktop