Update notification period change

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Tue Apr 5 20:23:23 UTC 2011


On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. So, just wanted to kick off a discussion regarding this bug:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688305
> 
> The default update notification period has been changed for GNOME in F15
> from 1 day to 1 week (security updates still get notifications
> immediately). This is a change that's come from upstream, the GNOME
> design team, who consider it a UI design issue. QA and FPL think this is
> at least partly a distro policy issue as well as / more than a UI design
> issue, and think we should consider whether we actually want to make
> this change for Fedora, and if so whether we should have a different
> update period for the pre-release cycle. QA certainly feels that 1 day
> is more appropriate than 1 week during pre-release time.
> 
> We chatted a bit about this during the blocker review meeting today, but
> all agreed this would be a more appropriate venue for discussion, so I
> wanted to kick off a thread. :) Thoughts?

Have there been any decisions on this topic?

Thanks,
James


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20110405/9aab976e/attachment.bin 


More information about the desktop mailing list