default filesystem

[Josh Boyer]

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 08:34:26PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > btrfs is still where we really want to go, I kind of think we should avoid
>> > the churn of swapping in one similar thing for another. (Since RHEL7 has
>> > already forked, that ship has sailed.) We talked about having btrfs/xfs
>> > filesystem talks at Flock -- is waiting until then too late to decide?
>> Are we really going to repeat the whole conversation we already had
>> around this earlier in the week?
> [...]
>> So.  I'd like to crap or get off the pot now.  This is supposedly due
>> Monday, but every time someone insists I revisit it, it's going to
>> take that much longer.  Do you have something new we've missed?
>
> I did read all of that, and sorry if I'm being obtuse. I think it really
> makes a difference if we still intend for btrfs to be the default in the
> medium term (not just in hopeful thinking). If that is the case for
> workstation but server still wants XFS even then, there doesn't seem to be
> any point in bothering with consistency now since it won't be consistent in
> a little bit anyway. On the other hand, if server does want to go with btrfs
> and relatively soon, and again if consistency is important, I'd like to push
> back on *server's* decision.

Thanks for the clarification.

josh